should be used on
priority for maintaining the existing functionalities. Uploading large
files used to work very well, so why has no effort been done to fix this
bug?
Regards,
Yann Forget
--
Jai Jagat 2020 Grand March Coordination Team
https://www.jaijagat2020.org/
+33-780 60 90 42
+91-74 34 93 33 58
Hi,
Could you please say on which this will happen?
Thanks,
Yann Forget
2018-02-07 2:00 GMT+05:30 Keegan Peterzell :
> Greetings,
>
> As the subject line says, there will be a Wikimedia Foundation-hosted IRC
> office hours [0] this coming Tuesday, 13 February 2018, from 18:00-19
Hi,
I agree that the "precautionary principle" has been used repeatedly to
delete files while there wasn't a "significant doubt" about a copyright
violation.
Alas, the community has had difficulties (euphemism...) to read a sain
consensus on this point.
If you have any receipt for a solution, I a
Bonjour,
Voici un exemple concret pour expliquer la résolution nécessaire :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pennsylvania_coal_miner.jpg
1200 × 1200 pixels est suffisant pour illustrer un article de Wikipédia,
mais pas pour restaurer les défauts de la photo (les rayures sont
clairement visi
Hi,
2017-05-22 22:07 GMT+02:00 geni :
> On 22 May 2017 at 20:03, Yann Forget wrote:
> >> geograph's 640 × 480 is the lowest widely used resolution.
> >
> > Any that small resolution should be refused nowadays.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ya
Hi,
2017-05-21 18:51 GMT+02:00 geni :
> On 21 May 2017 at 12:38, Flor Méchain wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am in touch with a museum that is thinking of uploading images to
> Commons.
> > They are a bit uncertain about uploading high resolution, but I told them
> > the resolution they need to upl
Hi, I can only say that I agree 100% with Steinsplitter.
Yann
2015-08-29 15:39 GMT+02:00 Steinsplitter Wiki :
> Wikidata needs to ask the Commons Community before doing commons related
> changes.
>
> It is so hard to understand what the wikidata people like to do with
> commons. Tons of text, har
e images specifically is that the key part of their
> project was the great difficulty in identifying and extracting the images
> from the books. . .
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Yann Forget wrote:
>>
>> I think it would be better to have the whole books, r
I think it would be better to have the whole books, rather than images
out of context.
Regards,
Yann
2014-08-29 15:04 GMT+05:30 Gerard Meijssen :
> Hoi,
> This article is of both interest to Commons and Wikipedia.. It is awesome.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-289
Hi,
2014-06-25 0:54 GMT+05:30 Rama Neko :
> The question of deleted images on Commons is exactly isomorphic to the
> various Wikipedias refusing to host copy-pasted material taken from Cthulhu
> knows where. And I have never heard anybody suggest that Wikipedia would be
> more "reliable" is it ac
Hi,
2014-06-24 22:04 GMT+05:30 Nathan :
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Chris McKenna wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Magnus Manske wrote:
>>
>>> 2. It means other projects can use files form Commons. Nowhere it states
>>> that Commons has to take whatever Wikipedias feel like storing the
Hi Rama,
Sorry, but you have it all wrong.
1. Wikimedia is a repository for other Wikimedia projects. It is its
primary mission.
2. But this does not make Commons contributors second-class. On the
opposite, importing and managing files for other projects make them
first-class IMHO. ;oD
Yann
2
o serve Wikipedia projects, not to antagonize them,
like it is the case.
I think users of the Hebrew Wikipedia has the right to know and to say
what they think about what affects them.
Yann
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Yann Forget wrote:
>> Suite of the drama.
>>
>> A re
olution is not found.
Regards,
Yann
2014-06-17 5:05 GMT+05:30 Yann Forget :
> Hi,
>
> Some Commons contributors like to ask impossible requirements, and
> threaten to delete files if these are not met. We have now a case of
> famous pictures from the government of Israel and Israel
Hi,
Some Commons contributors like to ask impossible requirements, and
threaten to delete files if these are not met. We have now a case of
famous pictures from the government of Israel and Israel Defense
Forces.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Matanya#Files_and_pages_that_were_delete
://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Massive_restoration_of_deleted_images_by_the_URAA
2014-04-04 2:02 GMT+05:30 Robinson Tryon :
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Yann Forget wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Well, it doesn't go so easily. Some Commons admins refuse to accept the
>> community de
Hi,
Well, it doesn't go so easily. Some Commons admins refuse to accept the
community decision, and want to maintain the status quo inspite of the huge
majority of opinions for supporting this. They are usually the most vocal
and bold admins.
Some admins are supporting it, some are afraid to go ag
Hello,
I got the torrent file file, but there isn't any peer.
https://archive.org/details/wikimediacommons-torrents
https://archive.org/download/wikimediacommons-torrents/wikimediacommons-torrents.torrent
Regards,
Yann
2013/10/13 Federico Leva (Nemo)
> WikiTeam has just finished archiving a
Hi,
Oh, there already was a wishlist, and it is quite funny to see how
fast it is already party obsolete. I think that
# Buy the Encyclopaedia Britannica
is not necessary any more. We have a better free encyclopedia. ;o)
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Copyright_wishlist
Regards,
Yann
2012/9
Hello,
2012/9/18 Michael Snow :
> On 9/17/2012 5:22 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
>
> Personally, I would prefer that people pursue freedom of panorama before we
> pursue "freedom of deep space objects". The later I would put pretty far
> down the priority list, actually. How about the following agenda:
Py mouss wrote:
> The license of the site (http://euobserver.com/static/terms) seems to be
> incompatible with the use of pictures licensed CC-BY-SA, no ?
What the license of the site has to do with the image ?
The site is certainly not a derivative of the image, so I don't see the
relation.
Re
Hello,
Platonides wrote:
> I was thinking on a FTP server where you log in with your wiki
> credentials and get to a private temporary folder. You can view pending
> files, delete, rename, append and create new ones (you can't read them
> though, to avoid being used as a sharing service).
> You ar
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> The objectivehere is NOT to have PNG but to support TIFF. This is what
> gets us credibility with our partners. This is what gives us the
> provenance that we care about representing material as it has been given
> to us. In this urging the use of PNG in stead of T
Andrew Turvey wrote:
>> Images on Commons need to be free in the US and the country of origin.
> If I
>> understand correctly, these images are from the UK, but the PD status to
>> pre-1923 images only applies to US images.
>
> That's interesting. How does this apply to the National Portrait Galle
Hello,
Dror Kamir wrote:
>>> - People who upload images to the Pikiwiki interface sign a legally
>>> binding statement in Hebrew. There is no use showing you the statement
>>> unless you speak Hebrew. I can translate it, but why on earth don't you
>>> trust the word of a recognized Wikimedia chapt
Hello,
Michael Maggs wrote:
> Flatbed scanners can be good, but only if they are of the (much more
> expensive) type that has an additional light in the lid as well as under
> the glass.
>
> Michael
>
> David Gerard wrote:
>> 2009/5/8 Jon Davis :
>>
>>> Not exactly a recommendation but a sugge
HI, I think this might interest Commons contributors.
Yann
Original Message
Subject: [LIG] 26 March 2008: The world's first Document Freedom Day
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:58:13 +0530
From: Frederick Noronha [फ़रेदरिक नोरोनया] http://documentfreedom.org/Applications
Greve concl
Hello,
This will have implications for Commons too.
Regards,
Yann
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:54 AM, GerardM wrote:
> Hoi,
> This is of sufficient merit that I do it this way.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> Aan u verzonden door GerardM via Google Reader: Court: Congress can't
> put public domain back i
Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
> A quick heads up: Image moving has been enabled for sysops per
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15842
OMG, the feature we have been waiting for 4 years!...
Yann
--
http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence
http://www.forget-me.n
29 matches
Mail list logo