Re: comments on the votes

2002-11-02 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Hi Stefano, It looks like there were only 69 votes cast. How many committers do we have in all? My intuition had been that it was >> 69, but I could be wrong. I wonder whether this list has brought over a sufficient mass of the community to be representative of the community. One could of cours

Re: [VOTE] Openness

2002-11-02 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Hmmm. I looked at the datestamp of the original vote message and it looked like I was under the 78 hour window for voting. But you are correct, it doesn't matter since I am just affirming the result. I thought it was 72 hrs ? ;-) Glenn -

Re: comments on the votes

2002-11-02 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Ah, one personal comment, we really need a better voting system :) doing it by hand is boring and very time consuming :/ +1

Re: Committers home pages

2002-11-02 Thread Bert Van Kets
Seems like the Forrest skin is getting to be the most used skin on the web. ;-) Bert At 21:09 2/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > That's why I have built a short home page at > http://www.apache.org/~sylvain where I briefly present myself. It's not > about pushing my ego, but ab

Re: comments on the votes

2002-11-02 Thread Sam Ruby
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: First of all, I was very happy to see that 'openness' doesn't appear to be a quality of any particular group of people. I perceive this somewhat reducing the value of Sam's thesis that jakarta has an 'open' attitude that the rest of the ASF doesn't have. +1 - Sam Ruby

Re: [VOTE] Openness

2002-11-02 Thread Glenn Nielsen
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > > >VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read > > >this mail list thru a web archive? > > > > > > [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable > > > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care > > >

Re: [VOTE] Openness

2002-11-02 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Glenn Nielsen wrote: >VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read >this mail list thru a web archive? > > [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private > > >- o - > > >VOTE 2: would

comments on the votes

2002-11-02 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
The previous message was a dry summary of the votation, but here I would like to comment it. First of all, I was very happy to see that 'openness' doesn't appear to be a quality of any particular group of people. I perceive this somewhat reducing the value of Sam's thesis that jakarta has an 'o

[vote result] openness

2002-11-02 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Se allowed three full earth rotations to allow everyone in the world to have time to partecipate in this discussion without restricting anybody due to geographical differences. Here are the raw results. - o - VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-commi

Re: [VOTE] Openness

2002-11-02 Thread Glenn Nielsen
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read > this mail list thru a web archive? > > [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private > > > - o - > > > VOTE 2: would you lik

Re: Committers home pages

2002-11-02 Thread David Crossley
Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > That's why I have built a short home page at > http://www.apache.org/~sylvain where I briefly present myself. It's not > about pushing my ego, but about showing who's behind the abstract > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'd like to propose each committer to build a simple ho