On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2003JulSep/0213.
> if ISO decides to charge, then will this have an impact on apache products?
In its current for: yes
> if so, is there any action that the ASF can take to influence I
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2003JulSep/0213.
if ISO decides to charge, then will this have an impact on apache products?
if so, is there any action that the ASF can take to influence ISO's
decision?
- robert
---
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
> mailing lists. I don't get the sense that he does this in order that the
> world will recognize him and adulate him as a hero. (Joshua, please
> correct me if I'm wrong ;-)
Personally, I'm just in it for the money.
Joshua.
---
> And why to not tell it direct. Many of the commiter are considered Apache
> gurus. That is true.
or s/committer/community/g
Dw.
PS: Right we are all individuals^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HGuru's.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
> IMHO Pier simply got the idea wrong. :-) So if you intend to do this,
> I'd be happy to play "the Turbine guy" (as long as I get some beer. ;-)
Ok - but more people may get this impression of guru-dom. So perhaps we
need to change the name a little. Or hand out so many guru buttons
that it
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 23:25, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> > Pushing the idea of a "guru" (IMVHO) is exactly the opposite of pushing the
> > idea of a community. It's a single individual over the bazillion of people
> > behind this or that project, and I wouldn
