Hi,
> Thanks for posting the clarification - which would puts me in favor of
> Felipe Leme's suggestion for a private list for committers.
>
> Steve.
+1 -- I'm in favor, too.
Suggestion:
"world at apache dot org"
Cheers,
-
T
My college's computer science club is looking to find non-local speakers
this year. Would anybody from the ASF like to speak in Michigan? The
topic would be open, but something generally appealing (e.g. ASF & it's
impact, using open source in business, etc) would be better than
something like
Hi Dave,
What do you mean with non-local? I'm non-local, that's sure. If you pay the
plane ticket I can go to Michigan and speak of whatever you want ;)
Regards
Carlos Sanchez
A Coruña, Spain
http://www.jroller.com/page/carlossg/Weblog
Oness Project
http://oness.sourceforge.net
> -Origin
El mar, 05-10-2004 a las 09:45 +0900, Tetsuya Kitahata escribiÃ:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks for posting the clarification - which would puts me in favor of
> > Felipe Leme's suggestion for a private list for committers.
> >
> > Steve.
>
> +1 -- I'm in favor, too.
>
What would be the advantages?
- I w
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Santiago Gala wrote:
What would be the advantages?
The only advantage I can think of is that many hypothetical conversations
on members@ that want to be private would be able to include committers.
Every now and then I see an email that says "We should discuss this on
member
Thought this might be of interest. There are a couple of books on
open-source licences out this year, one by Rosen (Ptr Hall) and one by
Andrew St. Laurent (O'Reilly).
The chapter concerning the ASF licences in the O'Reilly book is available
for download at:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/osfr
On 06 Oct 2004, at 01:05, Henri Yandell wrote:
Thought this might be of interest. There are a couple of books on
open-source licences out this year, one by Rosen (Ptr Hall) and one by
Andrew St. Laurent (O'Reilly).
The chapter concerning the ASF licences in the O'Reilly book is
available for do
