RE: [l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n] Internationalization project)

2003-07-16 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I set up the translated mirror site in my company's host > (jakarta.terra-intl.com), but if there is *completely > consistent infrastracture* in apache.org, I am willing > to put the contents on it. You are asking, I believe, about support for MultiViews. For any given page, P, there could be P

Re: [l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n] Internationalization project)

2003-07-16 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
------ On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:27:13 -0400 (Subject: RE: [l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n] Internationalization project)) "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was thinking on the l10n making "doc commits" a

Re: [l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n] Internationalization project)

2003-07-15 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:23:50 +0200 (Subject: [l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n] Internationalization project)) Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the original proposal was purely about i18n technology for java. > But the discussion drifted into tr

RE: [l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n] Internationalization project)

2003-07-15 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I was thinking on the l10n making "doc commits" and "properties > commits", ... themselves, and having means to track *both* the > source document (in the original project cvs) and the translated > documents (???). That would be possible if they were invited to have Commit access to a project's

[l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n] Internationalization project)

2003-07-15 Thread Santiago Gala
David N. Welton escribió: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Personally, I think that creating a project that consists of people that want to work on other projects is a bit weird. Why don't you just ask for a mailing list? The actual commits will have to be made by the specific proje