>But when I saw that Maven guys volunteered to make a plugin that outputs
>the descriptor, I proposed the DTD which is plainly from the Forrest
>extensions to Gump.
I'm not a committer, just contributor ;) I was just willing to make the
plugin, since the idea is good..
>Probably it means that it'
Peter Donald wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:58, Daniel Rall wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter Donald wrote:
Secondly make it so each project can have multiple vcs entrys (ie
Avalon and it's 6 or 7, turbine with the same).
Hmmm... this descriptor should have a 1-1 relationsh
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:58, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Peter Donald wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Firstly rename bugtrack to issuetracker as many projects use the
> > > issue tracker to store enhancement requests.
> >
> > Hmmm, how about:
> >
> > http://..."/>
Daniel Rall wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
Firstly rename bugtrack to issuetracker as many projects use the
issue tracker to store enhancement requests.
Hmmm, how about:
http://..."/>
http://..."/>
Naw, just about every tracker is used as a generic
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 16:45, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
[...]
Sounds good. What about the root element :-) ?
It has been asked by many to change the root element to , and
the to (or similar), but it should be made to
work with both semantics, for b
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Donald wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Firstly rename bugtrack to issuetracker as many projects use the
> > issue tracker to store enhancement requests.
>
> Hmmm, how about:
>
> http://..."/>
> http://..."/>
Naw, just about every tracker is used as
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 16:45, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Costin Manolache wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 16:03, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Costin Manolache wrote:
> >>
> >>>Can someone summarize what's wrong with the gump descriptor used by
> >>>all jakarta and xml projects ?
>
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 16:03, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Can someone summarize what's wrong with the gump descriptor used by
all jakarta and xml projects ?
I understand we may need to add more stuff ( maybe using some ns: ),
but I don't quite unde
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 16:03, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
> > Can someone summarize what's wrong with the gump descriptor used by
> > all jakarta and xml projects ?
> >
> > I understand we may need to add more stuff ( maybe using some ns: ),
> > but I don't quite underst
Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
Firstly rename bugtrack to issuetracker as many projects use the issue tracker
to store enhancement requests.
Hmmm, how about:
http://..."/>
http://..."/>
Secondly make it so each project can have
multiple vcs entrys (ie Avalon and it's 6 or 7, turbine with the same).
H
Costin Manolache wrote:
Can someone summarize what's wrong with the gump descriptor used by
all jakarta and xml projects ?
I understand we may need to add more stuff ( maybe using some ns: ),
but I don't quite understand why we need to change existing definitions.
If you look at the proposed DT
Hi,
Firstly rename bugtrack to issuetracker as many projects use the issue tracker
to store enhancement requests. Secondly make it so each project can have
multiple vcs entrys (ie Avalon and it's 6 or 7, turbine with the same).
I would also add a few more features. The two most improtant of whi
Can someone summarize what's wrong with the gump descriptor used by
all jakarta and xml projects ?
I understand we may need to add more stuff ( maybe using some ns: ),
but I don't quite understand why we need to change existing definitions.
Costin
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 14:08, John Keyes wrot
> > If the answer to above is yes : cool and from a maven perspective the above
> > is what can be offered, based on the maven project.xml, and I can write a
> > maven plugin to generate that xml.
> > If you had something different in mind, please explain ;)
>
> What you propose is simply a subset
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
See inline ;)
_projectinfo.xml_
http://mysite.org/";
hostname="mysite.org"
remotedir="/home/groups/m/my/myproject/htdocs"/>
http://myvcs/";
url="http://myvcs/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/"/>
http://myproject.org/mybugziulla/"/>
See inline ;)
> _projectinfo.xml_
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://mysite.org/";
> hostname="mysite.org"
> remotedir="/home/groups/m/my/myproject/htdocs"/>
>
> root="http://myvcs/";
> url="http://myvcs/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/"/>
>
> http://myproject.org/mybugz
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>Personally I prefer to have two files: one describes the project, and it
>>stays basically fixed; the other is more dynamic and changes frequently.
>>
>>_projectinfo.xml_
>>
>>- goals
>>- credits
>>- license
>>- resource URLs (site, mailing lists + archives, VCS stuff)
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
