I was thinking on the l10n making doc commits and properties
commits, ... themselves, and having means to track *both* the
source document (in the original project cvs) and the translated
documents (???).
That would be possible if they were invited to have Commit access to a
project's CVS,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:23:50 +0200
(Subject: [l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n]
Internationalization project))
Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the original proposal was purely about i18n technology for java.
But the discussion drifted into translation of docs
(Subject: RE: [l10n] localisation infrastructure (was Re: [i18n]
Internationalization project))
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking on the l10n making doc commits and properties
commits, ... themselves, and having means to track *both* the
source document (in the original
