So, are you saying the boring repetitive 'news' from Commons is the
problem? Or just the acronym?
I'm all for adding a line to Commons releases which say what the project
is actually for :)
make the news explain what the significance of the release is and what
the heck CLI is. The news blurb
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Not meaning to embarrass anyone, but I suggest not writing "news" on any
> "news" pages like this:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news.html#1106.1
>
> The Commons CLI team is proud to announce Commons CLI 1.0, the first
> official release of thi
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not meaning to embarrass anyone, but I suggest not writing "news" on
> any "news" pages like this:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news.html#1106.1
>
> The Commons CLI team is proud to announce Commons CLI 1.0, the first
> official release of
Not meaning to embarrass anyone, but I suggest not writing "news" on any
"news" pages like this:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news.html#1106.1
The Commons CLI team is proud to announce Commons CLI 1.0, the first
official release of this Commons component. Binary and source
distributions are a
