Re: Experience with Contribution Agreements
Hi Eduardo, there is a list of committers (they have all submitted the ICLA) and the page also contains the contributors (non-committers), that signed the individual CLA: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html (search for Persons with signed CLAs but are not committers) HTH, Matthias On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:12 AM, eduardo pelegri-llopart pele...@calterra.com wrote: Hi Craig! On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Eduardo, Well, I remember you from Sun. ;-) :-) I think the situation isn't well-understood. Once you sign the ICLA, your contributions are covered. If you don't want future contributions to be covered by the agreement, don't contribute any more. If you have a test case for a bug you submit, and don't want the test case to become part of your contribution, there's a tick box on the bug report that says this is not a contribution. Didn't know about that tick box; seems a good idea. What is the situation that you need covered? I can think of two cases. One is an unintentional contribution. This seems covered by the ASF ICLA clause about intentionally submitted, which is not present in Sun's SCA. The other is more of a statement where the individual might want to indicate that it no longer is supportive of the institution, but there are other ways to do that. BTW, is there a public list of everybody that has signed an ICLA/CCLA? Something like Sun's [4]. [4] http://sca.java.net/CA_signatories.htm For completeness, the current version of Oracle's CA is OCA 1.6 [5]. I believe it is the same as SCA 1.5, with s/Sun/Oracle/, but not 100% sure. It has several clauses not in the ICLA, including one specific to commercial entities indicates Any contribution we make available under any license will also be made available under a suitable FSF (Free Software Foundation) or OSI (Open Source Initiative) approved license. - that, of course, would not apply to ASF. [5] http://oss.oracle.com/oca.pdf - eduard/o [1]http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt [2]http://oss.oracle.com/oca-1.3.pdf [3]http://oss.oracle.com/oca-1.4.pdf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
Re: Experience with Contribution Agreements
Perfect. Thanks. It's always very useful to be able to borrow best practices from other communities. - eduard/o On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi Eduardo, there is a list of committers (they have all submitted the ICLA) and the page also contains the contributors (non-committers), that signed the individual CLA: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html (search for Persons with signed CLAs but are not committers) HTH, Matthias On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:12 AM, eduardo pelegri-llopart pele...@calterra.com wrote: Hi Craig! On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Eduardo, Well, I remember you from Sun. ;-) :-) I think the situation isn't well-understood. Once you sign the ICLA, your contributions are covered. If you don't want future contributions to be covered by the agreement, don't contribute any more. If you have a test case for a bug you submit, and don't want the test case to become part of your contribution, there's a tick box on the bug report that says this is not a contribution. Didn't know about that tick box; seems a good idea. What is the situation that you need covered? I can think of two cases. One is an unintentional contribution. This seems covered by the ASF ICLA clause about intentionally submitted, which is not present in Sun's SCA. The other is more of a statement where the individual might want to indicate that it no longer is supportive of the institution, but there are other ways to do that. BTW, is there a public list of everybody that has signed an ICLA/CCLA? Something like Sun's [4]. [4] http://sca.java.net/CA_signatories.htm For completeness, the current version of Oracle's CA is OCA 1.6 [5]. I believe it is the same as SCA 1.5, with s/Sun/Oracle/, but not 100% sure. It has several clauses not in the ICLA, including one specific to commercial entities indicates Any contribution we make available under any license will also be made available under a suitable FSF (Free Software Foundation) or OSI (Open Source Initiative) approved license. - that, of course, would not apply to ASF. [5] http://oss.oracle.com/oca.pdf - eduard/o [1]http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt [2]http://oss.oracle.com/oca-1.3.pdf [3]http://oss.oracle.com/oca-1.4.pdf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
Re: Experience with Contribution Agreements
Cool. Always nice to see communities in sync. Craig On Feb 16, 2011, at 10:18 AM, eduardo pelegri-llopart wrote: Perfect. Thanks. It's always very useful to be able to borrow best practices from other communities. - eduard/o On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi Eduardo, there is a list of committers (they have all submitted the ICLA) and the page also contains the contributors (non-committers), that signed the individual CLA: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html (search for Persons with signed CLAs but are not committers) HTH, Matthias On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:12 AM, eduardo pelegri-llopart pele...@calterra.com wrote: Hi Craig! On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Eduardo, Well, I remember you from Sun. ;-) :-) I think the situation isn't well-understood. Once you sign the ICLA, your contributions are covered. If you don't want future contributions to be covered by the agreement, don't contribute any more. If you have a test case for a bug you submit, and don't want the test case to become part of your contribution, there's a tick box on the bug report that says this is not a contribution. Didn't know about that tick box; seems a good idea. What is the situation that you need covered? I can think of two cases. One is an unintentional contribution. This seems covered by the ASF ICLA clause about intentionally submitted, which is not present in Sun's SCA. The other is more of a statement where the individual might want to indicate that it no longer is supportive of the institution, but there are other ways to do that. BTW, is there a public list of everybody that has signed an ICLA/ CCLA? Something like Sun's [4]. [4] http://sca.java.net/CA_signatories.htm For completeness, the current version of Oracle's CA is OCA 1.6 [5]. I believe it is the same as SCA 1.5, with s/Sun/Oracle/, but not 100% sure. It has several clauses not in the ICLA, including one specific to commercial entities indicates Any contribution we make available under any license will also be made available under a suitable FSF (Free Software Foundation) or OSI (Open Source Initiative) approved license. - that, of course, would not apply to ASF. [5] http://oss.oracle.com/oca.pdf - eduard/o [1]http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt [2]http://oss.oracle.com/oca-1.3.pdf [3]http://oss.oracle.com/oca-1.4.pdf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation Chair, OpenJPA PMC c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org