Currently, Android sucks big time, IMO. Google has no announced plans
for allowing developers to write any C/C++ applications.
Well I've managed to get a native C hello world running under the
android emulator, so it is possible to run native C/C++ applications.
All we need to do is work out
Ian Darwin wrote:
Anything less will lead to this sort of frustration, over and over again.
It is not always possible.
The way I figured it out, the GSM module will always be closed. This is
not due to the hardware specs being unknown, but due to the fact that
the law requires a transmitter to
exactly accurate respose/analysis.
Hank
On Nov 14, 2007 4:18 AM, Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Darwin wrote:
Anything less will lead to this sort of frustration, over and over
again.
It is not always possible.
The way I figured it out, the GSM module will always be
Not sure if thats good or bad. :)
I have noticed some oddities on first boot as well. Sim contacts don't
always seem to get populated.
This doesn't seem to be a qtopia issue, more of an neo issue.
I've found opening the back, taking the battery out and fiddling with
the sim card holder seems
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 05:02, Cameron Braid wrote:
Personally.. I think people should stop commenting on how they dislike
another toolkit.. Either use it, or don't - its your choice.
Perhaps that could also work for mailing lists when people don;t like what
other people decide to write
2007/11/14, William Voorhees [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
that's what I thought, till I found this:
http://git.android.com/
-WIll
Don't be fooled it's only the kernel sources: they have to publish
them, as required by the GPL. What about the libs sources? The VM?
Marty
Jeff Andros wrote:
you're on the community list... that kind of stuff should either be on
openmoko-dev or openmoko-apps depending on the sort of application you're
writing
ok, since I don't want to improve the openmoko core itself, but write some
application to install and run on my moko, I
upon further inspection it looks like your right, though I am still
hopeful based upon this entry in the FAQ.
http://code.google.com/android/kb/licensingandoss.html
Assuming that this is true, it only strengthens the case of the Neo
1973 and openmoko project. If the 850mhz issue resolved, I'll
See, we all think M$ sucks and Google rocks, but we have to remember
they are still a business. If M$ wasn't doing such a poor job, then
Google may not be so highly regarded today.
OpenMoko all the way!
-Kyle
On Nov 13, 2007 9:51 PM, Doug Sutherland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah it seems like
Yeah that is true but Googles saying:
Over time, more of the code that makes up Android will be released, but
at this point, we have been concentrating on shipping an SDK that helps
application developers get started. In short: Stay tuned.
But what does over time mean, that can be 2 months but
I wouldn't say I'm not concerned, but I'm hopeful. In one of the
video's Sergy Brin says that it will be entirely open. I hope that
google's Do No Evil slogan takes hold.
-Will
On Nov 14, 2007 1:34 PM, Festival.Star [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah that is true but Googles saying:
Over time,
Just came across this discussion
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thread/e8efe3d7e9927851/04302351954cbc6f#04302351954cbc6f
-Original Message-
From: William Voorhees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Regarding the GPS, please pay attention to the fact that the GTA-02 did
not solve this problem. It merely moved the non open source component
from the software to the firmware. This solves the supporting
libraries problem, but does not allow openness.
It solved the
I read the onlamp.com article about android, and there are a few issues
where I'm thinking wow, they are getting this right! and but what is
openmoko doing in this area?. namely:
security: I read android will confine each application by both using java
sandbox security, but also by having an
Shachar Shemesh
The way I figured it out, the GSM module will always be closed. This is
not due to the hardware specs being unknown, but due to the fact that
the law requires a transmitter to be approved by the FCC, and it is
impossible to get an approval for a transmitter that allows anyone
Cameron wrote
Personally.. I think people should stop commenting snip
If you don't like a comment, there is a delete key.
-- Doug
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Mike Montour wrote:
A serial-attached GPS module with closed-source firmware is no worse
than the hard drive with closed-source firmware in everyone's desktop PC.
Just for the record - I agree. It is unrealistic to expect EVERYTHING to
be open source at this stage. I'm just stating that the move
17 matches
Mail list logo
