On 07/27/2016 12:43 AM, karimi wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for SHR source code. Where can i find it?
Thanks
It seems:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/SHR has
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/SHR#More_Information which lists
http://trac.shr-project.org/ and
http://git.shr-project.org/
Mike
or money order to
the address on my domain name registration (Michael Sokolov, PO Box
488, Oceanside, CA 92049-0488, USA), but please be aware that with
this method, a portion of the check/MO amount would have to be wasted
on check cashing fees, between 3% and 10% depending on what kind of
check it
Yury S wrote:
> how to restore the battery for neo (pictures without any description,
> sorry)
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/zyth_2011/sets/72157646722873307/
I vaguely recall one of the experts on this list (or maybe it was some
other related list or forum) saying that a 2450 mAh battery in
David wrote:
> Is a GTA02 debug board any use to you? I'd be happy to mail it to you if so.
I already have one. :)
> Excellent - I'm glad you decided to continue.
Yes, I am continuing for the time being, finances etc permitting.
> From what I've seen and heard of the UK supplier 3 (the only 3G
There is one more free phone project still kickin':
https://bitbucket.org/falconian/freecalypso-sw
I somehow doubt that these new folks on the scene (indiephone.eu) will
produce a phone with a baseband processor whose firmware is delivered
to end users in full source form. At best they might mat
Nick wrote:
> Interesting results:
> [...]
> AT+COPS=?
> +COPS: (1,"T-Mobile ","T-Mobile","310260")
> OK
> [...]
> If I'm not mistaken the above means that only T-Mobile is found.
Yes, it does. 310260 aka T-Mobile USA is the only thing your FR can
hear in the PCS1900 band. Because your FR is
gram has a few nifty features specifically
* intended for those consoles.
*
* Beyond simple pass-thru of bytes in both directions, the following
* features are provided:
*
* - logging
* - ^P sends a break
* - binary upload via X command
* - changing console baud rate on HEC MC68302 tar
There is one more way to test/observe what 2G and 3G services and
carriers are available at a given location: by giving that AT+COPS=?
query command to a 3G USB modem stick that speaks AT commands. I've
got a Huawei E303 (South American Claro branding), it is supported by
recent versions of the us
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> Please consider that - it seems / I heard - several 850/900 and 1800/1900
> cells are getting reassigned in USA from GSM to UMTS or even LTE during last
> year. Ongoing.
Yes, I heard that too. Dunno about Boston area, as I'm nowhere near
there, but at least in my roam
Nick wrote:
> The phone that works is 3G, and it doesn't seem to have a 'force 2G'
> option anywhere.
The option in question often goes by different names: it may also be
named "network type" or "network selection" etc, with the choices
being GSM or WCDMA or both. Try selecting GSM if you can
Nick wrote:
> I tried the SIM in another phone and it does work, and another SIM
> in this one does not (both the same network).
OK, good observation. The problem is now narrowed down to the FR,
rather than network coverage in your area, your service subscription
or the SIM issued for it.
The
Nick wrote:
> I haven't been using my phone much recently, but it's always been
> reasonably reliable when I have. Today I turned it on, and all day
> it has just said "searching for network".
> [...]
> I'm not sure where to go or what to look for to debug this. I've
> restarted the phone mult
Hello project followers,
Just a quick update on where the FreeCalypso project stands. I am
still reconstructing the full-source form of TI's Calypso reference
firmware, the one which we currently have only in semi-src form,
running on TI's Leonardo board and on the GTA02 modem. How can one
recon
Norayr Chilingarian wrote:
> Yes, probably because they have this "call" and "sms" possibility.
Of course they (the carriers) provide call and SMS capabilities,
because I, their customer, want these capabilities, and would not be
their customer if they didn't provide such!
> But I
> am quite s
Norayr Chilingarian wrote:
> just would like to mention my needs, and unfortunately I cannot satisfy
> them with your project. [...]
> So I don't need a "phone", but a mobile computer [...]
Then my project is not for you. It is for those who specifically want
a plain old cellphone (dumbphone)
"Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" wrote:
> I have received a rumor that somebody is working on a
> truly free and open phone
This part is in fact true.
> with the following specs:
But the specs you have in mind are wrong.
> * Quad-Core Intel Z3770D (1.5 - 2.5 GHz)
Nope, it's an ARM7TDMI @ 52 MHz,
Quick update:
I have gathered the old subscribers’ list and
have invited (not autosubscribed) all former
members.
If you are not among the invited and have interest
to participate on the future of the FSO middleware
stack, then please feel very welcome to join
f...@openphoenux.org
Best regards,
Nick wrote:
> It's interesting to hear that 850MHz is a quite recent addition,
Just keep in mind that my idea of recent is "within the last 10 y",
at least in this case; most other people's definition of this word
probably means a shorter time span. :-(
All I know is that back in 2003 phones s
Nick wrote:
> I'm going to the USA soon,
Do you know which part of USA?
> and would ideally like to use my GTA02
> there. It is a European 900/1800/1900MHz version (I presume - I
> bought it 2nd hand - is there an easy way to check?).
As others have said, look at the sticker inside the battery
AP software into shape so it could
function as a poor man's imitation of a dumbphone.
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> I invite every =
> remaining Openmoko GTA01/02 owner to cannibalize their device for a =
> GTA04A5 motherboard.
There is a special place in Hell reserved for mu
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> You are a Pied Piper of Hamelin.
I don't mind the role. Check out The Stolen Child, poem/song by
William Butler Yeats - I particularly like this rendition:
http://www.elvendrums.com/cddragon.php
VLR,
SF
___
Openmok
openm...@pulster.de (Christoph Pulster) wrote:
> I remember adverts of Openmoko in capitals "100% FREE mobile".
> that this was a false promise comes evident afterwards.
I wonder how many people forked over their $$$ for those expensive
Openmoko phones primarily in the hope that the bloody NDA wo
Nick wrote:
> Any more hints as to what "additional freedom enhancements" you have
> planned?
* Pirelli DP-L10 has a bunch of extra chips supporting the WiFi/VoIP
and camera functions, chips for which there are no docs. I won't be
using any chips without docs in my design. The WiFi/VoIP f
openm...@pulster.de (Christoph Pulster) wrote:
> Besides legal issues, I miss the thanks to Michaels effords.
Thanks, I appreciate the change in attitude from this previous post
of yours:
: From: openm...@pulster.de (Christoph Pulster)
: To: community@lists.openmoko.org
: Subject: Re: Building a
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> I have no idea, I took care about GSM firmware only much later. But I think
> until the point in time when I was able to contract Dieter Spaar for OM, there
< been significantly less knowhow about all that stuff inside OM than what you
> demonstrate here.
Hehe. It loo
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> you recall that single line I actually censored?
http://people.openmoko.org/joerg/calypso_moko_FW/all_version__CHANGELOG.txt
line 60, I assume.
> (Must have been the only time
> in my life I did this) In the changelogs, around moko5 or something.
Considering the tim
Hello fellow freedom lovers,
I have just released the first version of the kit that allows a Neo
Freerunner user to set his/her IMEISV to any value of his/her choice.
Download it here:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/GTA02/ffs-edit-kit-r1.tar.bz2
Operating instructions are inside the tarball. The w
Giacomo 'giotti' Mariani wrote:
> Here we are:
> # diff -r michael-ffs my-ffs
Thank you for these diffs; explanation follows inline.
> Binary files michael-ffs/Test/Production.bin and my-ffs/Test/Production.bin
> differ
Yup, expected - if you hexdump this file, you&#
=?UTF-8?B?S2FpIEzDvGtl?= wrote:
> thanks to the recent activies I also thought about IMEI yesterday
> evening and it was fun that other's also did. Setting IMEI would still
> be a nice feature.
A general purpose FFS editing kit for GTA01/02 modems, which will
include the ability to set the IMEIS
Giacomo 'giotti' Mariani wrote:
> It's been easier than expected:
>
> root@neo:~# . /opt/qtmoko/qpe.env
>
> root@neo:/root# /etc/init.d/qtmoko-neo stop
> root@neo:/mnt/nfs/root/ModemFFS/Backup# fc-loadtool -h gta02 /dev/ttySAC0
> [...]
> root@neo:/mnt/nfs/root/ModemFFS/Backup# /etc/init.d/qtmoko-
Norayr Chilingarian wrote:
> Does anyone know what will happen in a cellular network where there is
> more than one device has the same IMEI. In other words, if we all
> could change our IMEI numbers, and use one imaginary number, are there
> technical reasons for network to not work.
joerg Reis
David Matthews wrote:
> Making a general purpose distro such as Qtmoko loadtools capable is likely to
> be a non starter.
I agree in general, but see below for some finer points.
> it's likely to be advisable to rip out all the audio stuff also.
That's where I need to provide some clarificati
Giacomo 'giotti' Mariani wrote:
> Hi Comrade,
> I can't find the FreeCalypso directory at
>
> $ ftp ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG
For a moment I was wondering "why are people going to that old FTP
site and not the new one at ftp.ifctf.org?", but then I realized that
I posted a bogus URL for loadtools-r2.
Hello project followers,
The tool for examining flash file system images read out of TI-based
GSM devices (which include Openmoko GTA0x modems) has just been
released:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/FreeCalypso/tiffs-iva-r1.tar.bz2
Aside from the naming and packaging change, the main functional
differe
Norayr Chilingarian wrote:
> If someone has no backup of calibration data, can she use calibration
> data from other phone?
> Then we can send our data to that person. Or it won't work this way?
> I probably don't understand it well.
joerg Reisenweber followed up:
> Not recommended and not ent
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> That's a bold misconception. OM wiki isn't censored, it just gets cleaned of
> SPAM and obviously incorrect AND hazardous info, like e.g. somebody suggesting
> to run wear tests against NAND to verify its formatting.
But I still think that it would be better for FreeCa
Giacomo 'giotti' Mariani wrote:
> Hi David, Michael, all,
> thanks a lot for your work, it is very emotional to see this
> "little" piece of freedom rising!
You're welcome. :-)
> I'm still not brave enough to risk my only (I mean in all my life ti
David Matthews wrote:
> I've done a bit of work, which I hope will encourage other people to give it
> a test. There is a full write up at http://winterveldt.co.za/leo2moko.html,
> with links to a distro I've prepared for the sole purpose of flashing your
> freerunner's calypso - either with leo2
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> There are tradeoffs everywhere. I think that having a 100% free
> firmware for the cell-phone part is really great. Having an up to date
> "smartphone" that runs Free Software is also great.
Hypothetically speaking, if someone would like to have a device in the
Neo FR f
For those who don't know what CSD is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circuit_Switched_Data
Here is an AT command session log of me making a CSD call from my
GTA02 on T-Mobile USA:
at+cgmm
+CGMM: "Neo1973 GTA02"
OK
at+cgmr
+CGMR: "FreeCalypso leo2moko port"
OK
at+cops?
+COPS: 0,0,"T-Mobile"
OK
a
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> Please can you save me from reading those walls of text filled with [...]
Thinking about it more, I realize that my initial post in this thread
was more inflammatory than necessary. So I do apologize for posting
that on an emotional impulse without thinking some more
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Not everybody is weighting the factor of "freeable down to the modem" equally
> when calculating the relative position of two devices to decide between
> "upgrade" and "downgrade". You have a different weighting than me.
If freedom is not important to you, then
"dmatthews.org" wrote:
> PuTTY is quite a decent (free as in beer) ssh client for windows
PuTTY is free as in speech too, i.e., it is bona fide free software -
not just free as in beer. Of course Windows isn't, but we are talking
about PuTTY, right?
VLR,
SF
___
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Why do you assume that your (IMHO unlawful) procedure done to "free" the
> Calypso is not possible for a Qualcomm modem?
Because all "modern" baseband processors (MTK, Qualcomm etc) have ROM
bootloaders which perform cryptographic verification of downloaded fw
i
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> So please think again if you want to upgrade your GTA02 with a GTA04A5 board.
Upgrade? Surely you must have meant downgrade - why would anyone in
his or her right mind voluntarily give up a device that is 100%
freeable down to the modem (GTA02) for a Qualcomm-b
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> Bottom line: even 850MHz FR can do 900MHz but the reception is pretty poor=
> though just sufficient in usual urban environment.
Hmm, interesting! Of course given the geographical theater I operate
in, my interest would be in going the other way around. The funny/sad
Hello Om community,
In the course of hacking TI GSM firmwares, I have come across something
that some of you may find interesting, or might even have some insight
into.
We all know that our good familiar Neo Freerunner (GTA02) was made in
two versions: one with 900/1800/1900 MHz bands, the other
Wow, I went to bed after my last post, and when I got up this morning,
there had been a lively discussion between Norayr, Joerg and Nick!
As much as I would love to be proven wrong on this, I consider it
*very* unlikely that there is any functional defect in moko11 which
somehow gets magically fix
Norayr Chilingarian wrote:
> Hehe, flashed your image!
> http://norayr.arnet.am/tmp/2013-11-09/Screenshot-2_patched.png
Nice!
> Thanks a lot.
You're welcome. :)
> I don't use gsm usually, I'll check how gprs works over gsm.
> It did not work before, usually SHR did not want to connect.
> [...
> Best regards
>
>
> mparchet
>
> Le 8 nov. 2013 à 23:20, "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller"
> >
> a écrit :
>
>
> Am 08.11.2013 um 23:08 schrieb Michael Parchet:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry I found only GTA04A4 but not GTA04A5 with LTE for pre order an
Norayr Chilingarian wrote:
> Okay, so first thing I did is I have compiled loadtools, as planned
> right on freerunner.
> [...]
> After short build I have three binaries installed
> fc-iram fc-loadtool fc-xram
>
> I believe they will run.
Congrats, you have successfully navigated one part which
Hello,
Sorry I found only GTA04A4 but not GTA04A5 with LTE for pre order and
price.
Why
Thanks for your answer
Best regards
mparchet
Le mardi 22 janvier 2013, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller a écrit :
> Hi all,
> finally, the GTA04A5 batch is ready for production and we are open for
> pre-orders t
"dmatthews.org" wrote:
> This is something I've quietly had an interest in for a year plus.
Yup, I remember you from 2011. :-)
> I'd like to suggest that it would be beneficial not only to have some hand
> holding for people that want to compile, but also sample binary for those of
> us that ma
Ian Stirling wrote:
> However, once anyone has used your work to change the IMSI of their
> phone
I assume you meant IMEI. Phones don't have IMSIs, those are numbers
stored in SIM cards.
> and you are aware of this,
Yes, I will most likely be aware of it, as I will gladly hand-hold any
crimi
Norayr Chilingarian wrote:
> Why not add information about free fw and loader to the mentioned wiki page?
> So that people who are not in this mailing list, may know about this fw
> and a free fc-load tool.
Adding the info to the wiki would be a good idea indeed, but there
would be several diffi
Jose Luis Perez Diez wrote:
> The procces to flash GSM firmware used linux, the serial port,
> and the fluid binary see
>
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/GSM/Flashing#Manual_Update_.28GTA01.2C_GTA02.29_.2F_geek_way
Yes, and that exact same procedure should work just as well if you
substitute yo
For those following the FreeCalypso project, I have just put out a
packaged release of my GSM flash reading/writing etc tools:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/FreeCalypso/loadtools-r1.tar.bz2
Of course the source for these tools has been available all along in
my freecalypso-sw Hg repository on bitbu
Norayr Chilingarian wrote:
> > then flash into your GTA0x GSM modem
> Wait, it works both on gta-02 and gta-04?
By GTA0x I meant GTA01 and GTA02. GolDeliCo' so-called "GTA04" is
rather badly misnamed: GTA originally stood for "GSM-TI-AGPS"; thus a
device that does not use a GSM chipset from TI
Hello Om community,
I am very pleased to announce that after many years of searching, I
have finally found a copy of TI's firmware deliverable package for
their Leonardo development board, i.e., for their Calypso/Iota/Rita
chipset reference platform. It is the package which TI must have
given to
Adam Bogacki wrote:
> Now that I have dir 'freecalypso-sw-SE52Fru5' I am not quite sure what
> to do.
> Is there some documentation available, or a man page ?
No documentation has been written yet, because there is nothing to
document yet: all that's there is a FreeNucleus RTOS skeleton and some
Adam Bogacki wrote:
> I have not been able to find working links to freecalypso-sw anywhere.
Not able to find *working* links? So the link I had posted earlier in
this thread:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/FreeCalypso/snapshots/freecalypso-sw-SE52Fru5.tar.bz2
is not working for you?
There is a
Nick wrote:
> Your free phone idea appeals to me enormously, Michael.
Yay, one more supporter!
> However, can GSM really be a base for secure communication anyway?
I see that after your post, the thread on the mailing list veered off
into a discussion of security. But that div
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> I invite you to visit me at my home
If you meant it seriously, you might as well give your address or GPS
coords (by unicast if you prefer) - but I highly doubt that you meant
it seriously.
> trying to force me to hand to you
Hand to me? What me? There is no "me" -
Bob Ham wrote:
> Please allow me to address a question to the community as a whole: if
> you can produce a free phone then why aren't you? Do it! What are you
> *waiting* for?
Well, as you've asked the community as a whole, without restrictive
language to exclude any particular factions of the
Radek Polak wrote:
> But one day your GTA02 will stop working - it might fall on the floor or
> whatever. GTA04 is only replacement -
Although it may be the only available replacement at the present
moment, it shouldn't remain that way for long. We, the FreeCalypso
community (see below), need
Bob Ham wrote:
> You moved from Canada to North Korea?
I have never lived in Canada. I don't live in North Korea either. In
fact, I don't "live" anywhere at all - being an active-duty
internationalist operative, I only *operate* in various countries,
working against their governments and laws,
Alex Samorukov wrote:
> > Which country is that?
> >
> dprk ? :)
Yes, I love it.
SF
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
look at it.
Until then, I shall continue working on the FreeTSM30/FreeCalypso code
base.
Patryk Benderz wrote:
> right... now I remember - Michael Sokolov.
I am not using my old name any more, I go by Michael Spacefalcon now.
Yes, I know, my Ancient UNIX email address still has my old l
Patryk Benderz wrote:
> There is leaked TSM30 source code for this GSM chipset firmware...
Yes, that's exactly what I'm using as my starting point.
> maybe there also is some documentation?
As far as hardware documentation goes, all of it is neatly gathered on
my FTP site: /pub/GSM/Calypso on
Harley Laue wrote:
> While I think the project you're working on is great, you come off
> sounding petty using terms like "Closedmoko." I /still/ don't think any
> open hardware phone has come out without some kind of NDA attached to
> some part (I could be wrong.)
My beef isn't so much with
in some Calypso chips
and related components. But this is a topic for much much later -
let's get the firmware liberated first, using our existing GTA02s.
Just don't despair if you aren't one of the lucky GTA02 owners.
Viva la Revolucion,
Michael Spacefalcon,
formerly Michael
Hello,
Could you inform me when the 3g or the 4g motherboard, or best, a
freerunner with this will be available by a supplier ?
Tanks by advance.
mparchet
2012/10/30 Al Johnson :
> On Monday 29 October 2012 20:16:34 Michael Parchet wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The swi
Hello,
The switzerland mobile phone providers will prepare the LTE (4g) network.
Do you think to make a 4g matherboard "gta05" ?
In my opinion, with only a 3g maserboard, the future freerunner will
be quickly out of date.
Whath's your opinion ?
Best regards
mparchet
201
Hi,
I'm waiting for an openmoko freerunner phone with gta04 or more recent.
Do you know when it will available ?
Best regards
mparchet
2012/10/28 Xavier Maillard :
> Hi,
>
>> It might be a good idea to have such a survey on your website
>> on what components people excpect on their tablet.
>
>
Hi,
> Arguably those two paragraphs are already well satisfied by oFono.
> oFono probably now has the advantage in terms of maturity and
> deployment, is compilable by a standard C compiler, and has a recent
> version packaged in Debian.
FSO is compilable with a standard C compiler as well. Every
Very well summarized, thanks Timo!
Cheers,
:M:
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
On 02/29/2012 05:35 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Then, we have to define a keyboard layout. QWERTY or ABCDEF. Add
numeric keys or make them Num+QWERTY to save one row of keys.
And to unsimplify, we need a US, a UK, a German, a French, an Italian
layout and maybe Chinese, Japanese etc. This i
"Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli" wrote:
> That points nowhere.
For you maybe, but not for me.
> I think you should instead try to go the legal way,
I disagree. Man-made law of every kind is my arch-enemy, and the
purpose of my life is to break those laws. Without law-breaking life
becomes devoid of
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> IMHO that has nothing to do with freedom at all. Just personal enrichment.
Objection: it is *NOT* personal enrichment if I share. If I were to
ever get a hold of the ware that I am after, I would NOT greedily
hoard it for myself like its current holders are doi
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Could it be possible that those "greedy bastards" don't even exist except
> in your wishful thinking?
I don't buy that - I don't buy the fairy-tale that each and every
former employee of Om-Inc who had NDA'd access to The Treasure has
refrained from sneaking a p
"arne anka" wrote:
> but if nikolaus is ok with that (re-stocking the used GTA02 boards, that
> is :-), that's certainly solution.
As I understand it, he already does that.
> - what's so hackable about the calypso fw? as far as i recall, it was a
> major afford to get an updated fw and make
"arne anka" wrote:
> so, what do you group tour subscribers plan to do with the replaced parts?
> just sink them in the waste basket? hang on the wall? or do you have a
> meaningful solution?
Please please please don't waste them, please make them available to
people like me who like GTA02 B
Am 21.12.2011 um 13:37 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller:
> Looks as if they urgently need more talks.
>
> This is IMHO a chance for SHR, QtMoko, FSO to present the latest
> great progress to a wider audience!
Yeah, there's just one thing that's annoying me... 15 minutes is
pathetic. Ok, for FSO w
Radek Polak wrote:
> i am rather saying:
> (shortage of existing GTA02 units) -> (GTA04 is the solution)
It is *a* solution for some classes of users. It is not *the*
solution for all use cases.
> Also pool graphics performace of GTA02 make the user experience very bad -
> hardly acceptable f
Radek Polak wrote:
> With my wooden case i had fully working phone - only single part
> that was from GTA02 was the speaker + microphone. I really dont
> think this is big problem.
Yes, and if I wanted to do the same thing (use a self-made wooden
case), I could have done it just as well with my
Radek Polak wrote:
> What's the point in investing time into device that is no longer manufactured
> and the number of users is decreasing to zero?
If it is so worthless in your eyes, why are you (not Radek personally,
but some others in this community) guarding that "moko" fw src/object
code s
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> it is obvious why the open and free software community needs
> a device where every individual has control over the software.
But isn't the GTM601 GSM/UMTS modem in the GTA04 just as closed as any
other? How is then GTA04 an improvement over GTA02 in terms of
o
Ben Thompson wrote:
> If someone on this list from Spain would buy a TSM30
> I would be happy to buy it from them (at a reasonable price),
Me too.
Alternatively, if someone else succeeds in obtaining a TSM30, please
share your resulting findings:
* exactly what chips are inside
* any other hw
Ben Thompson wrote:
> Here is my attempt :-
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Image:Gta02a6_comms_chips_under_shield.JPG
This photo is pretty good - thanks! From it we can tell that:
* The RF transceiver chip is TRF6151C, just like the one on the
Leonardo board for which we have the docs. It'
Hello Openmoko community,
I am happy to announce that the archivists at Cryptome.org have added
my contribution of the TSM30 source to their website collection:
http://cryptome.org/tsm30/tsm30.7z
The content inside is exactly the same as what I have, they have
merely repackaged it from ISO to 7z
David Pottage wrote:
> I think you will find that it is imposible to make data calls to an
> analoge modem. The reason is that GSM and it's sucessor standards are
> inherently digital, and are derived from ISDN telephone standards, so
> nothing in your phone or in the phone network will create to
The bubble mailer with the TSM30 CD among other things is now on its
way to Cryptome; the post office has told me to expect around 2-3 days
delivery.
Hopefully the archivists at Cryptome will be interested in hosting
this stuff, as it would cut out the delay of waiting for me to get
around to sett
Martix wrote:
> Ok, no need to hurry. Openmoko community waited for more than three
> years for full open access to whole GTA02 internals, we can wait another
> month.
The CD set destined for Cryptome, including the TSM30 CD, has been
written and will go out in the mail tomorrow (Friday): the
Martix wrote:
> For example Rapidshare or maybe Ubuntu One on your laptop...
The Ubuntu laptop isn't mine, it belongs to my employer du jour.
Because it's too much like Weendoze, I refuse to personally own a
Ubuntu machine. Learning how to use Ubuntu One isn't very appealing
to me.
> Ok, so le
Martix wrote:
> If you really have that sources, you can upload them on some public file
> sharing website and post link here on mailing list.
I don't know of any public file sharing websites to which anyone can
upload anything.
> Of course, you are going to lose control over this files
What
Hello Om community,
Given that the GTA04 contains an off-the-shelf UMTS module and, if my
understanding is correct, truly off-the-shelf GSM/GPRS/UMTS modems in
the consumer USB stick form factor have been used during the
BeagleBoard prototyping phase for the GTA04, I've figured that someone
here m
Antonio Murdaca wrote:
> So, it's a dream to have a full GTA04 with case,battery,screen etc etc in a
> real near future? :( I mean, i have to buy a GTA01/02 and do the stuff to
> replace the mothherboard to have a GTA04
When you gut your GTA02s to stuff GTA04 boards into them, PLEASE don't
throw
Hello Openmoko community,
I've got some Glamo chip docs on my FTP site which I thought someone
here might find useful, given that this chip is used on the GTA02:
ftp://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/pub/GSM/GTA02/Glamo/
Enjoy!
MS
___
Openmoko community mailing
Gennady.Kupava wrote:
> Nice that you care about licenses,
More precisely, I care about freedom. GPL's requirement of providing
the source simply happens to coincide with an identical requirement in
my personal belief system.
> no violation because link to sources
> is provided on wiki page
O
Gennady.Kupava wrote:
> I tried to fix few annoying bugs and using own u-boot version, you can
> find description here:
>
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/U-boot-gena2x
I think I have mis-expressed myself in my original post... I am not
looking for a prebuilt binary, I want a source tree that I
1 - 100 of 2096 matches
Mail list logo
