On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Tim Schmidt wrote:
>> I've got a nearly-never-used Freerunner I'd like to sell...
>
> To help people decide, please tell us which version is it, GTA02v5,
> v6, v7, what fi
I've got a nearly-never-used Freerunner I'd like to sell...
It's fully functional, original battery, charger w/ adapters, box,
Zagg invisible shield (which has been applied to the screen since day
1), and a tuxbrain.com leather case w/ stylus.
I'll ship anywhere in the US.
Here's a couple photos
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Steve Mosher wrote:
> I am somewhat constrained in what I am able to say. On one view there is
> the position,
> held by some, that any hardware that is merely CAPABLE of mp3 decode is
> required
> to apply for a license.
So these dolts want a license fee for every
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Al Johnson
wrote:
> On Thursday 21 May 2009, zogg wrote:
>> Thats intresting. What could have stopped them from making it
>> non-monochrome in daylight?
>
> Probably cost and efficiency as these were major factors in OLPC. If PixelQi
> don't start producing screen
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:01 AM, zogg wrote:
> Thats intresting. What could have stopped them from making it
> non-monochrome in daylight?
It's not possible, as light coming from the front of the LCD will have
to pass through the prism in the wrong direction in order to be
reflected back through
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:12 AM, zogg wrote:
> Looks like LCD for indoors are common, and for outdoors theres scarcity.
> So, do you know any manufacturers, or at least in what direction should
> i try and look at?
The OLPC has an LCD which is very easy to read in daylight. When
backlit, it appe
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:43 PM, David Pottage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless we want a closed source driver, I don't think that would work.
>
> Reading between the lines on the Tungsten Graphics website. it looks to me
> that they have one core graphics driver, that they keep porting to whate
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Timo Jyrinki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, Wolfgang, hopefully you didn't miss Tim's post, sounds promising
> :) As do the other offers of help.
I'd just really like to get documentation out into the wild. I
understand that performance is unlikely to ever be
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Wolfgang Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Openmoko actually has learnt a lot from this. First we have learnt to
> not trust high-level promises as much as before.
> In fact I would go as far as saying that going forward, we will not
> trust any promises about 'we
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Wolfgang Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me link back to one of my Weekly Engineering News (back when they
> were still weekly, ahem - I am working hard to get this good
> discipline back!)
> http://lists.openmoko.org/nabble.html#nabble-td837114
>
> We looke
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Chris Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why I said "as much as anyone can know these days".
It just can't be repeated enough. Many people still don't understand
cost - to the community as well as companies - of the ongoing
situation of software patents.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Chris Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd still rather a format that didn't risk (as much as anyone
> can know these days) such lawsuits in the first place..
_All_ software risks such lawsuits.
Software patents are so over-broad, vaguely worded, impenetrably
i
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Daniel Benoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think people will be willing to pay an extra $200 just to get a
> camera in there.
Please do some research before making baseless comments. Camera
modules do not cost $200. More like $10. Less in quantity. See
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I agree, but people that bought one without knowing the full extent are
> going to be mad. It's essentially a
> $400 mistakethe only real return policy stated is against the hardware
> being
> DOA and not buyer's regr
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Andy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We didn't get to the end of meddling with the Glamo yet, but what we got
> is what we got so far. The biggest handicap by far for that chip is we
> can't share the documentation.
Is there anyone we can contact, as community m
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:05 PM, arne anka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> /media/card/Maps/OSM/
>
> with (my) 2007.2 that path does not point to the sd card.
Hmmm... odd. It always has here. Anyway... you can substitute
whatever directory your card is mounted in under /media for "card" in
my pa
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Vinc Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> I'd like to put the maps on the SD card. Is there a sensible path on
> the SD card I should use?
/media/card/Maps/OSM/
That's the path used in the scaredycat images.
--tim
___
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:35 PM, steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Give people a free repair kit?
> 2. work with distributors to do repair.
> 3. Host repair PARTIES! Woo hoo. Bring your own soldering iron. BYOSI
Personally, a kit would work for me. I have fine pitch solder and a
nice iron,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Steven **
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone interested in a different group buy?
> I want one of these:
> http://www.jetmall.net/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=303
> I think it would go with my FreeRunner very well. It even has a
> little strap that I could
Awesome. At least we now know what's causing the problem.
Is there a chance that changing the orientation of the internal
antenna slightly (perhaps through very minor modifications to the
inside of the plastic case) could rectify the issue?
--tim
___
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Francesco Cat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ehm... I don't get what you meant to say...
You said you thought they cared about Linux / Open Source. In the
last 10 years, I haven't seen a single hint that they do. One
possible (absurd) explanation is that we've been
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Francesco Cat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nvidia seems to care about Linux and OpenSource
In what world have you been living for the last 10 years or so?
--tim
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmo
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Joerg Reisenweber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Meanwhile we are about to improve the hw to cope with this (a little difficult
> without exact idea of the way this happens).
Meaning, the improvement will show up in a new rev of the Freerunner,
or in the next model p
23 matches
Mail list logo
