As a long-time Linux user, I have an emotional attachment to GTK+
that ... um ... transcends reason. And primarily for that reason, I
would like to see the old GTK+ interfaces (often called GTK software
stack or 2007.2 stack) maintained. I will even be helping where and
how I can (Though I can't
To support that, the next step forward would be someone taking the wheel and
creating a project @ projects.openmoko.org, moving/copying all relevant
sources from Om SVN and OHand SVN into this project, then handing out
accounts for all interested people.
Then you can move quickly.
--
:M:
On Friday 27 June 2008 20:14:26 Lorn Potter wrote:
QWebKit
QtWebKit
z.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Community Initiative GTK
-[ Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 05:27:52PM +0200, Francesco Cat ]
I must have missed something... Can you post some links to explain
what are the future plans for the Software Stack? Will GTK not be
present any more?
IIRC GTK
Initiative GTK
Marcus Bauer wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
would be nice.
e.g. take the last gtk-based ui apps, rip out all libgsmd and neod
dependencies and start communicating with the new middleware from FSO.
this would
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
Actually many companies have expressed their interest in a GTK based
platform as it is perceived as more future proof than some kind of
exotic software stack with a very small developer base.
Lots of
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Marcus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
First of all, I'd be interrested in getting things to build on an iMac
G5. After that, we'll see where it goes. I'm not against tha idea,
although
Im not sure I understand anything about OpenMoko software plans.
So I will reply your question with another, probably dumb one :
Is anyone planning to try maemo on the freerunner ?
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
...
Thus are there developers/companies on the list interested in
maintaining GTK on the openmoko phones and starting a community
initiative? Pretty much 90% is already there!
I will try to be there
Is anyone planning to try maemo on the freerunner ?
my question, too.
and what about ubuntu mobile? does anybody know whether the plan to test
it on om? at least it's the first open phone in the wild -- should be a
given development platform for them ...
I must have missed something... Can you post some links to explain
what are the future plans for the Software Stack? Will GTK not be
present any more?
2008/6/27 Joe Pfeiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I for one definitely prefer GTK: as a toolkit I know and like it (in
fairness I haven't developed for
although I'd have to learn to program TK (but learning a new plaform
seems to be my forte lately...)
not sure, if you confuse something:
gtk!=tk
gtk is a c based toolkit used by gnome and gimp, tk ist a gui toolkit on
top of tcl.
If all else fails, I'll get an older PC off of eBay (or
hello crist,
First of all, I'd be interrested in getting things to build on an iMac
G5. After that, we'll see where it goes. I'm not against tha idea,
although I'd have to learn to program TK (but learning a new plaform
seems to be my forte lately...)
I have my Santa Rosa iMac building
-[ Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 05:27:52PM +0200, Francesco Cat ]
I must have missed something... Can you post some links to explain
what are the future plans for the Software Stack? Will GTK not be
present any more?
IIRC GTK is still present and always will be. But there are no more
plans to
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 17:27 +0200, Francesco Cat wrote:
I must have missed something... Can you post some links to explain
what are the future plans for the Software Stack? Will GTK not be
present any more?
Basically Openmoko has stopped the development of the GTK stack in order
to start a new
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have my Santa Rosa iMac building package images over an usb storage
using ubuntu mokomakefile; You don't have any need to invest in other
hardware
That's an Intel Mac, not a G5 one...
Christ van Willegen
--
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:30 PM, arne anka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christ wrote:
although I'd have to learn to program TK (but learning a new plaform
seems to be my forte lately...)
not sure, if you confuse something:
gtk!=tk
gtk is a c based toolkit used by gnome and gimp, tk ist a gui
Which is why I wondered what happended to the previous plans to provide
a complete mobility software set. But perhaps the aim of OpenMoko has
always been to release a phone, and that I daydreamed the software stack?
:-/
I wondered the exact same thing. From the front page of the wiki:
Marcus Bauer wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
would be nice.
e.g. take the last gtk-based ui apps, rip out all libgsmd and neod
dependencies and start communicating with the new middleware from FSO.
this would basically solve all
On 27 Jun 2008, at 16:56, Marcus Bauer wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 17:27 +0200, Francesco Cat wrote:
I must have missed something... Can you post some links to explain
what are the future plans for the Software Stack? Will GTK not be
present any more?
Basically Openmoko has stopped the
PROTECTED]
Asunto: Community Initiative GTK
Para: List for Openmoko community discussion community@lists.openmoko.org
Fecha: viernes, 27 junio, 2008 4:49
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
Actually many companies have expressed their interest
vie, 27/6/08, arne anka [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
De: arne anka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: Community Initiative GTK
Para: List for Openmoko community discussion community@lists.openmoko.org
Fecha: viernes, 27 junio, 2008 5:26
Is anyone planning to try maemo on the freerunner ?
my question
2008/6/27 Marcus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
Actually many companies have expressed their interest in a GTK based
platform as it is perceived as more future proof than some kind of
exotic software stack
Am Freitag, 27. Juni 2008 19:02:04 schrieb Stroller:
Am I right in understanding that the earlier software stack wrote GTK
to the framebuffer, whereas the ASU required the incorporation of an
X11 server to the image?
No, the Gtk based (focused?) stack used X11 as well, using Kdrive as
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Marcus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 17:27 +0200, Francesco Cat wrote:
I must have missed something... Can you post some links to explain
what are the future plans for the Software Stack? Will GTK not be
present any more?
Basically
Marcus Bauer wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
Actually many companies have expressed their interest in a GTK based
platform as it is perceived as more future proof than some kind of
exotic software stack with a very small
Jisakiel wrote:
You forget the biggest: Nokia (sells as many phones a day as iphones yet
sold).
14 Nokia phones are made each second.
Rest are just startups so far, or non-mobile-phone-related... And
Nokia looks like interested in QTopia (as they bought Trolltech!) ;)
Firefox
So just to be clear, FSO stands for FreeSmartphone.Org?
And that stuff is working so well that it can replace gsmd and neod already?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Joachim Steiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Bauer wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the
Mike Doody wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Marcus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 17:27 +0200, Francesco Cat wrote:
I must have missed something... Can you post some links to explain
what are the future plans for the Software Stack? Will GTK not be
present any
Joachim Steiger wrote:
Marcus Bauer wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
would be nice.
e.g. take the last gtk-based ui apps, rip out all libgsmd and neod
dependencies and start communicating with the new middleware from FSO.
My
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 16:49 +0200, Marcus Bauer wrote:
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
Part of what you want need is distribution support. You might find it
amusing to see how crazy fast GPE on Gentoo, a meta Linux distribution,
can be ported to a
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 04:13 +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
Marcus Bauer wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
Actually many companies have expressed their interest in a GTK based
platform as it is perceived as more future proof
Marcus Bauer wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 04:13 +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
Marcus Bauer wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is any interest in maintaining the GTK software
stack?
Actually many companies have expressed their interest in a GTK based
platform as it is perceived as more
33 matches
Mail list logo
