On 8/14/09, arne anka wrote:
>> If the app doesn't have FSO support, use fsoraw to request the resource.
>
> _now_ i am confused.
> in my understanding
> - "resources" are an fso concept -- thus, no fso support, no resource
> - fsoraw uses fso calls to utilize the resource -- no resource, no way t
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 14:15 +0200, arne anka wrote:
> > If the app doesn't have FSO support, use fsoraw to request the resource.
>
> _now_ i am confused.
> in my understanding
...
> what i always tried to find out, and i understand now even less than
> before: what is the rationale for fsoraw?
>
> If the app doesn't have FSO support, use fsoraw to request the resource.
_now_ i am confused.
in my understanding
- "resources" are an fso concept -- thus, no fso support, no resource
- fsoraw uses fso calls to utilize the resource -- no resource, no way to
use fsoraw
>> why using fsoraw, why
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:15:31AM +0200, arne anka wrote:
>
> >> - the fso way of retrieving the resource is discouraged
> >
> > Hm, no? fsoraw does exactly that: manages access to resources the fso
> > way.
>
> it's not that i know all these fso dbus commands by heart, but
>
> mdbus -s org.fre
4 matches
Mail list logo
