On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if this is useful. It sounds a bit more like a
marketing group.
You have to pay a fee to join.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Dean Collins wrote:
Long overdue and if it is a standard then lets all jump onboard
and work
with it
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:19:34 Paul A. Lambert wrote:
compatible this group is at least in philosophy. The
participation is closed, the forum allows patented code (as long as
the license is non-discriminatory). Even with these issues, I'd
still be very interested in seeing what they
Long overdue and if it is a standard then lets all jump onboard and work
with it from inside rather than throwing rocks from the outside.
Cheers,
Dean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin Paulson
Sent:
From what I read, the LIPS group is creating an 'open' standard. The
impression I got from that was the other phone standards group was
'closed' whatever that means.
If we are going to back a group, maybe FIC should join it and help in
the development process of the standard. None of the
Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From what I read, the LIPS group is creating an 'open' standard. The
impression I got from that was the other phone standards group was
closed' whatever that means.
It just struck me that the phone book contact info is pretty close to
what one wants for a
I'm not sure if this is useful. It sounds a bit more like a marketing group.
You have to pay a fee to join.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Dean Collins wrote:
Long overdue and if it is a standard then lets all jump onboard and work
with it from inside rather than throwing rocks from the outside.
6 matches
Mail list logo
