na
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2007 1:01 AM
> To: community@lists.openmoko.org
> Subject: Re: Sun JavaFx
>
> Marco Miani wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I've just read this
> >
>
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id
Jim Thompson writes:
>aren't related (much) to openmoko, so I suggest we take these off-line,
>unless 'the list' decides they would rather watch/join the discussion
>here. (And yes, I agree that I contributed to the discussion going
>off-track.)
I for one have been interested (decades ago I w
Shawn,
I'm more than happy to engage and debate these points, but its likely
off-topic (or at least not "in scope") for the list (which is about
openmoko and/or the community that surrounds openmoko).
Topics such as:
"why is Java slow" (and how to construct hw to make it go fast
concurrency
On 5/10/07, Jim Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Terrence Barr - Evangelist, Java Mobile & Embedded wrote:
> Shawn,
>
> I have been very involved in this area at Sun now for a couple of
> years. Let me add come comments:
>
> Hardware accelerated Java is actually fairly common already, at
> lea
Terrence Barr - Evangelist, Java Mobile & Embedded wrote:
Shawn,
I have been very involved in this area at Sun now for a couple of
years. Let me add come comments:
Hardware accelerated Java is actually fairly common already, at
least in the Java ME space using ARM's Jazelle technology. It does
Shawn,
I have been very involved in this area at Sun now for a couple of
years. Let me add come comments:
Hardware accelerated Java is actually fairly common already, at
least in the Java ME space using ARM's Jazelle technology. It does
have some benefits in very constrained platforms but in gen
I'm very disappointed that Sun has put off hardware-accelerated Java
devices and Java operating systems for so long (they could have done
this at least 5 years ago, if not more). The much-vaunted Java Chips
never materialized in significant quantities of devices. The Java
Station had such disapp
Does this mean there will be non-open sourced parts in the stack
necessary
to use JavaFX Script?
>>> Sun has already said that JavaFX Mobile (the stuff you need for the
>>> phone) will be GPLed.
>>>
>>> So.. "no".
>> Well, this is not exactly true. Sun indeed said explicitly that
>>
I know its bad form to respond to one's own posting, but watch the end
of the 'webcast' around the 15:00 mark, just after McNealy gets up to
talk about Curriki, and then compares Rich Green to Jobs, where Jonathan
Schwartz turns to ask Rich Green:
JS: "Rich, how would you feel about someone
Sander van Grieken wrote:
Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand c
> Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
>>> That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
>>> definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
>>> on.
>>
>> If I understand co
> Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
>>> That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
>>> definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
>>> on.
>>
>> If I understand co
On Thursday 10 May 2007 12:04:22 Jim Thompson wrote:
> > Does this mean there will be non-open sourced parts in the stack
> > necessary to use JavaFX Script?
>
> Sun has already said that JavaFX Mobile (the stuff you need for the
> phone) will be GPLed.
Humm, thats kinda conflicting with
http:/
Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand correctly, JavaFX Script is
>> I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
>> scripting).
>
> That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
> definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
> on.
If I understand correctly, JavaFX Script is going to be ope
Stefano Sanna wrote:
Marco Miani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just read this
>
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id=16310
>
> about sun JavaFx and a mockup of a phone that will be presented
> soon WTF it's a Neo
>
2007/5/8, Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 08/05/07, Marco Miani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just read this
>
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id=16310
>
> about sun JavaFx and a mockup of a phone that will
Marco Miani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just read this
>
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id=16310
>
> about sun JavaFx and a mockup of a phone that will be presented
> soon WTF it's a Neo
>
> somebody knows someth
; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id=16310
>>
>> about sun JavaFx and a mockup of a phone that will be presented soon
>> WTF it's a Neo
>
>
>Now that's funny... But as the text says:
>
>"even as he released a ph
On 08/05/07, Marco Miani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I've just read this
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id=16310
about sun JavaFx and a mockup of a phone that will be presented soon
WTF it's a Neo
Now that's funny... But
Hi
I've just read this
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id=16310
about sun JavaFx and a mockup of a phone that will be presented soon
WTF it's a Neo
somebody knows something more ?
bye
Marco
__
21 matches
Mail list logo
