Subject: Re: Switch from GTK to QT (was: ASU software - pre-pre-release
impressions)
Date: mer 21 mag 08 09:22:38 -0400
Quoting Nkoli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Carlo E. Prelz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My complain
2008/5/21 Nkoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Carlo E. Prelz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> My complaint is that it would be difficult for me to put my hands into
>> the default apps. They are C++, QT, and expectedly using enough of
>> those creepy C++-isms (possibl
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Carlo E. Prelz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My complaint is that it would be difficult for me to put my hands into
> the default apps. They are C++, QT, and expectedly using enough of
> those creepy C++-isms (possibly, even those yecchy templates or
> whereabouts
> Funny way to define the concept. I must disagree: if you "use the various
> classes"
> you write C++.
Fair enough. I have seen plenty of C code using C++ objects that I
didn't think of as real C++ code. It felt more like Obj-C to me, but
again, to each their own.
> Subjectively (for me), it is
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Well... Why not use the Qt bindings for Ruby, then?
> http://rubyforge.org/projects/korundum/
>
Very cool. I've been thinking I might need a Ruby project for a while now. I
might have to give that library
Tuesday 20 May 2008 skrev Carlo E. Prelz:
> I write code as a job (have been doing that for longer than I wish to
> remember). C and Ruby are my current tools.
Well... Why not use the Qt bindings for Ruby, then?
http://rubyforge.org/projects/korundum/
(also, i might make the note, that whi
Subject: Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions
Date: mar 20 mag 08 08:21:06 -0600
Quoting Travis Tabbal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Carlo E. Prelz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The switch to QT
> > *requires* the abandoning of C in favour
7 matches
Mail list logo
