On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:05:03 +0200
"Risto H. Kurppa" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Joel Newkirk
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:05:10 +0100
> > Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> >> Additionally there are a lot of Packages that don't contain a
> >> control file with depencies and so
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Joel Newkirk wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:05:10 +0100
> Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
>> Additionally there are a lot of Packages that don't contain a control
>> file with depencies and so on:
>>
>> Form the packages in debian format are these:
>>
>> 0_tshark_1.0.9
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:05:10 +0100
Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Additionally there are a lot of Packages that don't contain a control
> file with depencies and so on:
>
> Form the packages in debian format are these:
>
> 0_tshark_1.0.99+svnr26030_armv4t.ipk
> 0_wireshark-common_1.0.99+
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:30:36 +0200
"Risto H. Kurppa" wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Tobias Kündig
> wrote:
> > This is a little summary of what I do: http://www.opkg.org/repo.html
>
> Thanks Tobias!
>
> At #openmoko tried to figure out what's wrong. Someone pointed out
> that ftp use
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:30:36 +0200
"Risto H. Kurppa" wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Tobias Kündig
> wrote:
> > This is a little summary of what I do: http://www.opkg.org/repo.html
>
> Thanks Tobias!
>
> At #openmoko tried to figure out what's wrong. Someone pointed out
> that ftp use
gt;> Packages
Greets, Zaptac
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Troubles-with-opkg.org-repo-tp2434780p2448399.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Openmoko community maili
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 09:09:15AM +0100, Tobias Kündig wrote:
> This is a little summary of what I do: http://www.opkg.org/repo.html
Debian has this tool called dpkg-scanpackages in the dpkg-dev package. It
might simplify your create_repo script. Example usage:
$ cat updateindex
#!/bin/sh
(
(...cut...)
With that huge list of broken packages, wouldn't it be better to just
remove them from opkg.org's repository while good versions are uploaded?
maybe after that implement some sort of automatic check for both
conditions (file type and control file inside)
regards
Tom
___
Am Sunday 08 March 2009 14:30:36 schrieb Risto H. Kurppa:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Tobias Kündig
wrote:
> > This is a little summary of what I do: http://www.opkg.org/repo.html
>
> Thanks Tobias!
>
> At #openmoko tried to figure out what's wrong. Someone pointed out
> that ftp uses asci
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Tobias Kündig wrote:
> This is a little summary of what I do: http://www.opkg.org/repo.html
Thanks Tobias!
At #openmoko tried to figure out what's wrong. Someone pointed out
that ftp uses ascii mode by default - I suppose you're uploading at
least the Packages -a
This is a little summary of what I do: http://www.opkg.org/repo.html
Am 06.03.2009 22:09, schrieb Risto H. Kurppa:
At the moment it looks like that the opkg.org repository is very
> unstable: packages keep breaking all the time more and more, now I
> wasn't install sortdesk anymore. AFAIK nothin
At the moment it looks like that the opkg.org repository is very
unstable: packages keep breaking all the time more and more, now I
wasn't install sortdesk anymore. AFAIK nothing has changed in the
package itself.
Tobias: Could you release the scripts that manage the files for public
eye to check
Hi all,
I have for now disabled the opkg.org repo on my FreeRunner. It kept
disturbing opkg update and opkg upgrade. It also offers packages like
cellhunter which are not hosted on opkg.org, are identical in files, but
result in segmentation fault of opkg.
So back to normal and explicit opkg inst
13 matches
Mail list logo
