Hey again,
On 3 Aug 2009, at 19:01, Steven Le Roux wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Mirko
> Lindner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am still alive and by no means agree that I am not doing anything.
>> I would agree that I am not coding right now. I am in active
>> contact with the pyneo crew, met
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Mirko
Lindner wrote:
> Hi,
> I am still alive and by no means agree that I am not doing anything.
> I would agree that I am not coding right now. I am in active contact with the pyneo crew, met with them in Hamburg and talked with fgau of epydial how to get the apps
Hi,
I am still alive and by no means agree that I am not doing anything.
I would agree that I am not coding right now. I am in active contact
with the pyneo crew, met with them in Hamburg and talked with fgau of
epydial how to get the apps into paroli. MDT of pyneo who has started
2 branch
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Laszlo
KREKACS wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
>> (I understand that Laszlo didn't get the support needed but got some
>> of his code rejected -> lost interest.. )
>
> I would like to add my 2 cents here;)
>
> I didnt stopped workin
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Laszlo
KREKACS wrote:
> Thank you very much for your offer, I will compile my list of
> questions, and shoot at you;)
>
> Besides, I would like to talk with you, how can we more collaborate...
No problem. You can sometime find me on freenode IRC as charlie137
(usual
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Guillaume Chereau wrote:
> Beside, even though I stopped working on paroli long before Mirko, I
> still understand how the core works ; contact me by email (or on this
> list) if you have any question about it, I can have a -quick- look at
> it.
Thank you very much
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Laszlo
KREKACS wrote:
> There are many ongoing work, which needs to be integrated into
> paroli. There are two branches by Dietrich, namely tacheles
> and rebase. Where tacheles needs some very deep (tichy/paroli)
> knowledge, to be able to integrate into paroli.
He
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> 3 issues that need solving
>
> "SIM card full" when it's not really full as the messages are stored in the
> rootfs.
Need to look into how to fake incoming sms', because, I dont use sms at all.
>
> Contacts disappearing
Like loosing co
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> (I understand that Laszlo didn't get the support needed but got some
> of his code rejected -> lost interest.. )
I would like to add my 2 cents here;)
I didnt stopped working on paroli at all,
just my attention was distracted by some hobb
Hi,
I meant to say
On Wed, 29.07.2009 at 22:04:16 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I'm a bit out-of-sync with all of you, due to "other work",
that I'm sorry if there's a bit of duplication, and I also don't
expect a quick fix.
I have one feature request, though:
* Ability to explicitly refuse t
Hi,
On Fri, 24.07.2009 at 08:40:45 +0200, Mirko Lindner
wrote:
> There still is the plan to release a final version of Om2009. It
> would be good if we could assemble a list of problems in paroli that
> need fixing for the release.
I'm a bit out-of-sync with all of you, due to "other work"
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 14:00, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> Dnia 2009-07-27, pon o godzinie 13:01 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
> pisze:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:41, Patryk Benderz wrote:
>> > [cut]
>> >> You should "feel" the air.
>> >> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never
On July 27, 2009 03:04:30 am Adolph J. Vogel wrote:
>
> I must admit this whole thread is starting to worry me. I don`t mean to
> pester but could someone please provide some clarrification on the status
> of Om2009 / Paroli?
>
Om2009 is moving forward very slowly at the moment. My time is curren
Dnia 2009-07-27, pon o godzinie 13:01 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
pisze:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:41, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > [cut]
> >> You should "feel" the air.
> >> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never saw a
> > [...]
> >> guess why their software crashes on late
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Michal Brzozowski wrote:
> 2009/7/27 Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
> > Packaging apps on your own is bad by design (unless you're packaging
> > closed source apps, but they are also bad :P), not changes in SHR.
> >
>
> No it's not bad by design, because some peo
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 13:14, Michal Brzozowski wrote:
> 2009/7/27 Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
>>
>> Packaging apps on your own is bad by design (unless you're packaging
>> closed source apps, but they are also bad :P), not changes in SHR.
>
> No it's not bad by design, because some people use other d
2009/7/27 Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
>
> Packaging apps on your own is bad by design (unless you're packaging
> closed source apps, but they are also bad :P), not changes in SHR.
>
No it's not bad by design, because some people use other distros than SHR,
like Om2008.
Plus if someone publishes a ne
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:41, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> [cut]
>> You should "feel" the air.
>> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never saw a
> [...]
>> guess why their software crashes on latest shr, rebuild and upload
>> again on opkg.org and so on).
> Well, Sebastian, i have t
[cut]
> You should "feel" the air.
> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never saw a
[...]
> guess why their software crashes on latest shr, rebuild and upload
> again on opkg.org and so on).
Well, Sebastian, i have to say Nicola has a point here. I agree.
[cut]
--
Kind Regards
> Less man power is the right way of putting it. There still is
> development on both projects but less than before. Laszlo is doing a
> great job improving things in paroli which I am very thankful for.
> There still is the plan to release a final version of Om2009. It
> would be good if we could
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:40:14AM +0300, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Mirko
> Lindner wrote:
> > Less man power is the right way of putting it. There still is
> > development on both projects but less than before. Laszlo is doing a
> > great job improving things in par
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 17:21, Nicola Mfb wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian
> Krzyszkowiak wrote:
> [...]
>> We just don't want to release crap as "stable". There were problems
>> with either FSO, SHR, build system etc. We wanted to start releasing
>> testing images regular every
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian
Krzyszkowiak wrote:
[...]
> We just don't want to release crap as "stable". There were problems
> with either FSO, SHR, build system etc. We wanted to start releasing
> testing images regular every week... week ago. But there is opkg
> problem, which is p
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 04:11, Nicola Mfb wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> [...]
>> r - someone unhappy feeling that no-one is working on Paroli or
>> bugfixing it.. I actually tried Zhone the other day (when Paroli or
>> FSO failed to delete SMS's from the SIM) a
On Friday 24 July 2009 23:40:14 Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> I actually tried Zhone the other day (when Paroli or
> FSO failed to delete SMS's from the SIM) and was very pleased with it
> - I'd really like to see it developed further!
I heard that multiple times now, I think the UI really has somethin
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
[...]
> r - someone unhappy feeling that no-one is working on Paroli or
> bugfixing it.. I actually tried Zhone the other day (when Paroli or
> FSO failed to delete SMS's from the SIM) and was very pleased with it
> - I'd really like to see i
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Mirko
Lindner wrote:
> Less man power is the right way of putting it. There still is
> development on both projects but less than before. Laszlo is doing a
> great job improving things in paroli which I am very thankful for.
Hard to believe: http://git.paroli-proje
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mirko
Lindner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24 Jul 2009, at 02:04, Nicola Mfb wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>> Is om2009 and paroli in a temporary sleeping status or was development
>> terminated?
>> Somethings changed in the last days and may be now there is less man
>> power to improve t
Hi,
On 24 Jul 2009, at 02:04, Nicola Mfb wrote:
> Hi!
> Is om2009 and paroli in a temporary sleeping status or was development
> terminated?
> Somethings changed in the last days and may be now there is less man
> power to improve them.
Less man power is the right way of putting it. There still
Hi!
Is om2009 and paroli in a temporary sleeping status or was development
terminated?
Somethings changed in the last days and may be now there is less man
power to improve them.
Regards
Nicola
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.op
30 matches
Mail list logo
