Re: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks

Ronald Noah has a point. Let’s stick to AfriNIC issues which you have articulated very well. I’m shocked by the things you’ve said and hope for more action from AfriNIC. As to your internet links about how corrupt Uganda is let me just respond to you with the link below. https://www.forbes.co

Re: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks

In message Noah wrote: rfg> And now, because Uganda is so corrupt, >> > >The one would also claim that the USA is equally corrupt but I will not go >around claiming such even though I suspect that some American nationals are >also involved in some of the corruption around IPv4 numbers. > >As su

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

In message Noah wrote: >And who the heck is Jan Vermeulen now? He is a South African journalist who has written extensively about the thefts of AFRINIC-administered IPv4 address blocks. Google is your friend. >There's quite a lot of sordid details that >> I know about, and I've only publicly

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

In message Noah wrote: >> So the question must be asked: Why is AS37100 (or anybody else) still >> peering with the bogon AS26754? >> > >Ans dude since this was just brought into the Internet community attention >yesterday... My records indicate that AS26754 was de-registered by AFRINIC and be

Re: [Community-Discuss] Questions

In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201224011757.0ca37...@elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" wrote: >1. There is a message at > >about querying previous versions of "objects" in Whois. Deleted >objects are not queryable. Yes, that is one o

[Community-Discuss] WHOIS data base access

Merry Christmas to all! In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959...@elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" wrote: >{... response snipped...} I am not sure that it would be productive for me to try, yet again, to make the points that I have tried to make on the topic of WHOIS data base access, both

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

> On 24 Dec 2020, at 13:32, Libra via Community-Discuss > wrote: > >  > Noah are you member or LIR? If you are real person then what is the problem > in submitting our id proofs to Moderator ? Verification and censorship are > two different things. What are you talking about? > Who knows

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

> On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:14, Nishal Goburdhan wrote: > > On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:29, Libra via Community-Discuss wrote: > >> Noah are you member or LIR? > > [snip nonsense] > > hey noah, (and other bona fide people) > > please don’t feed the trolls. > it only makes them hungrier, and appear

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 16:15 Nishal Goburdhan, wrote: > On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:29, Libra via Community-Discuss wrote: > > > Noah are you member or LIR? > > [snip nonsense] > > hey noah, (and other bona fide people) > > please don’t feed the trolls. > it only makes them hungrier, and appear more oft

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:29, Libra via Community-Discuss wrote: > Noah are you member or LIR? [snip nonsense] hey noah, (and other bona fide people) please don’t feed the trolls. it only makes them hungrier, and appear more often. —n. ___ Community-Di

Re: [Community-Discuss] Questions

On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:25, Ish Sookun wrote: Instead, I see you are arguing with a Board Director who is only telling you that AFRINIC has a regulatory constraint in giving you access to data it possesses. this is not quite a regulatory constraint. this information is, or was, already in the

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 15:33 Libra via Community-Discuss, < community-discuss@afrinic.net> wrote: > - Noah are you member or LIR? > Who is asking? - If you are real person then what is the problem in submitting our id > proofs to Moderator ? > Mr.Moderator I am at your disposal. - Verification a

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

Noah are you member or LIR? If you are real person then what is the problem in submitting our id proofs to Moderator ? Verification and censorship are two different things. Who knows maybe you and Ronald are are same person or maybe I am sock puppet :)  Your psychological warfare tactics are no

Re: [Community-Discuss] Questions

Hi Ronald, On 24/12/2020 12:12, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Where are you located Mr. Moonesamy? Are you in a place where only things > that are expressely allowed by law are permitted?? In Mauritius, the Data Protection Regulation is taken seriously. If you have a concern with the way your

Re: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks

On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 12:41 Ronald F. Guilmette, wrote: > And now, because Uganda is so corrupt, > The one would also claim that the USA is equally corrupt but I will not go around claiming such even though I suspect that some American nationals are also involved in some of the corruption around

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 01:02 Ronald F. Guilmette, wrote: > In message wddrabazo4rx9qof1mcbkug4m+...@mail.gmail.com> > Noah wrote: > > rfg> Please note that Ernest Byaruhanga is still enjoying some of his > rfg> stolen AFRINIC space, > > > > > >You have repeated the above quite a lot in all your e

Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources

On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 01:14 Ronald F. Guilmette, wrote: > Let me begin by saying that I have only just been informed that there is > some connection between Noah and SEACOM. My apologies > to him. No need to apologize Some members of the AFRICAN Internet community besides myself tend to we

Re: [Community-Discuss] Questions

Dear Mr Guilmette, At 12:12 AM 24-12-2020, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: This is the single most bizzare question I have been asked this entire year. And it has already been quite a strange year! Personalizing a discussion is a distraction from the gist of the matter. If I understood correctly,

[Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks

My apologies to all. In my haste to respond to Noah last night, I neglected to include in my listing of known stolen AFRINIC-administered legacy IPv4 address blocks one particular /16 block. And in many ways, this is the single most egregious theft that has been perpetrated by some combination o

Re: [Community-Discuss] Questions

In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959...@elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" wrote: >>There is no basis in law for this. AFRINIC and S. Moonesamy are simply >>stonewalling. > >What is the basis in law which permits a researcher to access the {data} in > bulk? This is the single most bizzare qu