Re: Is there a C compiler for classic macs? (68000)

that's supposed to be THINK c... I have a light copy of it here with the book that came with it. Jim Arnott wrote: > Thiok C comes to mind... > > Christopher Kolp wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>Does anyone know of a C compiler that will run on a Macintosh Classic or >>any "compact mac" for that matter

Re: Is there a C compiler for classic macs? (68000)

Thiok C comes to mind... Christopher Kolp wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know of a C compiler that will run on a Macintosh Classic or > any "compact mac" for that matter? -- Compact Macs is sponsored by . Support Low End Mac

Re: CD-ROM extention?

On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 05:54 AM, Scott Holder wrote: > OT/PPP works fine with 7.1. You'll want to use the installer though, > not > try to copy it out of a later version. > Please remind us; is there a separate installer for OT/PPP that we can simply run after we've installed 7.1 on

Re: CD-ROM extention?

At 07:32 PM 1/28/2003 -0500, you wrote: >Rule #1 of 68K Software: > >If they claim it needs 7.5.x, don't believe them until you've found that it >*doesn't* work with 7.1.x. OT/PPP works fine with 7.1. You'll want to use the installer though, not try to copy it out of a later version. I use 7.1 o

Is there a C compiler for classic macs? (68000)

Hi all, Does anyone know of a C compiler that will run on a Macintosh Classic or any "compact mac" for that matter? I found Harvest C but even the author says it's extremely buggy. Anyone used this? Thanks in advance, Chris -- Compact Macs is sponsored by . Supp

Re: Found Some Older AOL Software

At 04:37 + on 29/01/03, Chris Lever wrote: >About a year ago, maybe 18 months but no more than that I found a copy of >AOL 2x. I installed it on my Classic running system 7.0 with system tune up That's probably just before they quit supporting it; I don't remember exactly when it was but tha

Re: Found Some Older AOL Software

On 1/29/03 3:17, "the pickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 21:19 -0400 on 28/01/03, Jason White wrote: > >>> So if anyone has a use for this software (seem to recall a thread on one of LEM's lists saying that AOL won't work with less than 4.0ish) contact >>> >>> You recall correctl

Re: Found Some Older AOL Software

At 21:19 -0400 on 28/01/03, Jason White wrote: >> >>>So if anyone has a use for this software (seem to recall a thread on one >>>of LEM's lists saying that AOL won't work with less than 4.0ish) contact >> >>You recall correctly; they've quit allowing access from any pre-3.x client. > >So basicly y

Re: Found Some Older AOL Software

> >>So if anyone has a use for this software (seem to recall a thread on one >>of LEM's lists saying that AOL won't work with less than 4.0ish) contact > >You recall correctly; they've quit allowing access from any pre-3.x client. So basicly you're saying I'm not going to get flooded for requests

Re: Found Some Older AOL Software

At 20:20 -0400 on 28/01/03, Jason White wrote: >So if anyone has a use for this software (seem to recall a thread on one >of LEM's lists saying that AOL won't work with less than 4.0ish) contact You recall correctly; they've quit allowing access from any pre-3.x client. -- the pickle FAQ

Found Some Older AOL Software

While trying to clean up this computer room a bit (and find that @#$%ing missing Zip disk), I ran across a pile of floppies that neither my wife nor I knew what was on them. (I heard they made labels for these things...) Anyhow, one of the disks was an installer for AOL 2.7. Remember back in

Re: First Rule; Was: CD-ROM extention?

>It should be fine if you get the right ones, but if you have problems >you know which extensions to move out of the folder. :) > >Matt I tend to have way too much stuff in those folders. Conflict Catcher 3 does a pretty good job of keeping it all straight for me. The only thing I've added that

Re: CD-ROM extention?

On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 06:10 PM, Jason White wrote: >> Rule #1 of 68K Software: >> >> If they claim it needs 7.5.x, don't believe them until you've found >> that it >> *doesn't* work with 7.1.x. > > What was I thinking? Probably 1/4 of my extensions and Control Panels > are > from 7.

Re: CD-ROM extention?

>Rule #1 of 68K Software: > >If they claim it needs 7.5.x, don't believe them until you've found that it >*doesn't* work with 7.1.x. What was I thinking? Probably 1/4 of my extensions and Control Panels are from 7.5 and later. Thanks for reminding me, J White Buy American S.O.S. Save Our St

Re: CD-ROM extention?

At 18:34 -0400 on 28/01/03, Jason White wrote: >I'm sure it's in the FAQ, but will OT/PPP even run with System 7.1? I >thought it required 7.5.5 and up. Rule #1 of 68K Software: If they claim it needs 7.5.x, don't believe them until you've found that it *doesn't* work with 7.1.x. -- the pickle

Re: CD-ROM extention?

>might I suggest using Open Transport/PPP instead? Actually, that's what I'd prefer to use. But it doesn't let me change the connect speed for my 56k modem and I was unable to find a script that would reduce it to 28.8 or even 33.6. I've tried the script generator program, and either I failed a