On 5/14/07, David Reveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It can give slightly different results depending on if the software or
> hardware water simulation is used but it should be close enough to not
> really matter.
Here the FBO version was actually fine even with 40, but software
rendering needed
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:07 -0500, Erkin Bahceci wrote:
> On 5/14/07, David Reveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Great, I've committed all patches except
> > Stop-Water-drawing-right-after-waves-disappear as I'm not sure how you
> > came to the conclusion that the count variable could be decremen
On 5/14/07, David Reveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great, I've committed all patches except
> Stop-Water-drawing-right-after-waves-disappear as I'm not sure how you
> came to the conclusion that the count variable could be decremented at
> that rate. Did you make any calculations to come up wit
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 18:03 -0500, Erkin Bahceci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a look at some problems I saw in the Water plugin. Here are the
> patches fixing those.
>
> The file names should be self-descriptive.
Great, I've committed all patches except
Stop-Water-drawing-right-after-waves-disappear a
Hi,
I had a look at some problems I saw in the Water plugin. Here are the
patches fixing those.
The file names should be self-descriptive.
Regards,
Erkin
From 450379b6f5bb60f18222cca0cceacab189b1f5e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erkin Bahceci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:36:2
