On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Dennis Kasprzyk
wrote:
> In compiz++ I've made few little changes that do not follow the our previous
> coding style:
> - allow variable definition in "for" loops:
> for (int i = 0; i < foo; i++)
> In the "C" version of compiz we've tried to follow the C89 rules, bu
In compiz++ I've made few little changes that do not follow the our previous
coding style:
- allow variable definition in "for" loops:
for (int i = 0; i < foo; i++)
In the "C" version of compiz we've tried to follow the C89 rules, but this is
not necessary anymore and should improve readability.
Kristian Lyngstøl wrote:
> As I stated in my original post, I don't want an entire book.
Whoops, missed that. sorry for the noise...
___
compiz mailing list
compiz@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:09 PM, troy d. straszheim wrote:
> IMHO this is by far the best Coding Standard for C++:
>
> http://www.gotw.ca/publications/c++cs.htm
As I stated in my original post, I don't want an entire book. We're
not doing enough bad stuff for that to be necessary. The draft I ma
Kristian Lyngstol wrote:
>
> That's it so far. I really hope someone can rip this apart, since I ended
> up trashing my more detailed ideas and threw this together in a hurry. At
> least it should get the discussion started.
>
> Specially since this is written with C, and not C++ in mind.
>
Hi,
I've been trying to come up with some good coding standards, but I've
realized that most of us already know most of this. So instead of trying to
define every aspect of how we code Compiz-code, I'll try to outline some of
the finer points. For a more complete list, you can review any of the many
co
