[Expired for compiz (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Well it still seems to affect me even when running 11.04. It seems to
work for much longer periods of time but every now and then the window
decorations will disappear. I'll run more tests to see what is
triggering it but I still have problems...
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Brian Starkey
<6
I'm afraid I have got a new system (with an nVidia card) so won't be
able to do any more testing on this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600867
Title:
Compiz fails
** Tags added: compiz-0.8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600867
Title:
Compiz fails to load when screen width == maxTextureSize
___
Yes, I agree with you. The > is not a bug in itself, but a workaround
which should not be used as it cripples people with non-intel cards.
--
Compiz fails to load when screen width == maxTextureSize
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600867
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Honestly, it should be strictly greater than (>). The bug you show may be
related to a different issue or in compiz in a different part of the code.
They need to leave it as greater than and fix the other problems rather than
leaving this as a work-around that affects other people. My guess is th
The > check is apparently NOT fine for Intel graphics. I haven't tried
compiling your fix myself yet (going to try this weekend, never built a module
before :-/), but Bug #428769 reports that when > is used, you get a blank
screen (with possibly one visible column of pixels).
Intel graphics with
Having the > check is fine, having the >= check is just plain wrong. They
need to resolve this because I hate having to keep recompiling this thing
after every update. Apparently it is very low priority and I even pointed
out the exact fix that needs to be made. Someone just has to approve and
f
I have this on an intel 945GM card.
I think the >= check was added due to Bug #428769, but why is this necessary?
If my max texture size is 2048, why can't I use a 2048 resolution?
--
Compiz fails to load when screen width == maxTextureSize
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600867
You received thi
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51264358/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51264359/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51264360/Dependencies.txt
** A
10 matches
Mail list logo
