Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-23 Thread Tobias Schlitt
Hi Philipp, On 04/24/2010 06:01 AM, Philipp Kamps wrote: > I curious about the consequences for eZ Publish. Today eZ Publish requires the > components library - will it in the future? it will, as can be read here: http://share.ez.no/blogs/ez/goodbye-ez-components-welcome-zeta-components Regards

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-23 Thread Philipp Kamps
I curious about the consequences for eZ Publish. Today eZ Publish requires the components library - will it in the future? On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Bertrand Dunogier wrote: > > > 2010/4/20 Tobias Schlitt >> >> On 04/20/2010 07:23 PM, James Pic wrote: >> > What would be the point of ch

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Bertrand Dunogier
2010/4/20 Tobias Schlitt > On 04/20/2010 07:23 PM, James Pic wrote: > > What would be the point of changing prefix? > > None, actually. Just with a completely different name, the prefix feels > kinda wrong and would look ugly. > For what it's worth, I completely agree with Toby. There is no rush

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Tobias Schlitt
On 04/20/2010 07:23 PM, James Pic wrote: > What would be the point of changing prefix? None, actually. Just with a completely different name, the prefix feels kinda wrong and would look ugly. But changing of prefix won't happen before we go 2.0 anyway, which I don't expect to happen soon. -- Com

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread James Pic
What would be the point of changing prefix? -- http://jamespic.com/contact Customer is king - Le client est roi - El cliente es rei. -- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Kore Nordmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20/04/10 17:41, Björn Dieding wrote: > Hi, > > I can`t find myself yet comfortable with the name "Zeta". What is the > background behind Zeta? It doesn`t smell like PHP. Also I prefer > KISS. Maybe a 2 or 3 letter Acronym that is not yet used by an

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Björn Dieding
Hi, I can`t find myself yet comfortable with the name "Zeta". What is the background behind Zeta? It doesn`t smell like PHP. Also I prefer KISS. Maybe a 2 or 3 letter Acronym that is not yet used by anything else. More generic. So I spend some time one a list. - PHP Enterprise Components pec o

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Thomas Nunninger
Hi, Am Dienstag, 20. April 2010 15:11:48 schrieb Piotrek Karas: > Björn Dieding wrote: > > Why was there the need to rename them? > > > > Best regards, > > Björn Dieding > > easyComponents could have been an alternative close yet distinct ;) > > While I understand why this can be a good decision f

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Piotrek Karas
Björn Dieding wrote: > Why was there the need to rename them? > > Best regards, > Björn Dieding easyComponents could have been an alternative close yet distinct ;) While I understand why this can be a good decision from the project's perspective (the ASF thing, not the name ;)) and I think it'

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread David Coallier
On 20 April 2010 14:00, Tobias Schlitt wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > On 04/20/2010 02:53 PM, Dirk Schmedding wrote: >> And what is about the preface "ezc" in all classes? Will it be kept >> (forever) or changed to "zeta" or something? > > we will not change the prefix in a near future. BC was always one o

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Tobias Schlitt
Hi Dirk, On 04/20/2010 02:53 PM, Dirk Schmedding wrote: > And what is about the preface "ezc" in all classes? Will it be kept > (forever) or changed to "zeta" or something? we will not change the prefix in a near future. BC was always one of the key goals of the project and it will stay like this

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Dirk Schmedding
And what is about the preface "ezc" in all classes? Will it be kept (forever) or changed to "zeta" or something? Greets Dirk Am 20.04.2010 14:49, schrieb Tobias Schlitt: > On 04/20/2010 02:45 PM, Björn Dieding wrote: >> Why was there the need to rename them? > > The problem with the name "eZ Co

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Tobias Schlitt
On 04/20/2010 02:45 PM, Björn Dieding wrote: > Why was there the need to rename them? The problem with the name "eZ Components" is that everybody thinks that it's a product of eZ Systems. Such relations are often hindering if you want to talk about it on conferences and similar. Those people have

Re: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components . welcome Zeta Components!

2010-04-20 Thread Björn Dieding
: [Components] Goodbye eZ Components ... welcome Zeta Components! Hi all, I'm proud to announce that we just proposed eZ Components to the Apache Software Foundation. Find more details on the following sites: http://share.ez.no/blogs/ez/goodbye-ez-components-welcome-zeta-components http://schlitt