Re: [Components] PersistentObject: Interface ezcPersistentObjectSession

2009-04-29 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Tobias Schlitt wrote: On 04/22/2009 11:28 PM Benjamin Eberlei wrote: I see no disadvantages from forcing the current session from overtaking the identity map changes. Its a natural feature addition that shouldn't cause any backwards compability issues. I

Re: [Components] PersistentObject: Interface ezcPersistentObjectSession

2009-04-25 Thread Frederik Holljen
On 25/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt t...@ez.no wrote: Hi all, On 04/24/2009 11:17 PM Frederik Holljen wrote: On 24/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt t...@ez.no wrote: On 04/24/2009 09:10 PM Frederik Holljen wrote: Yes. Let me elaborate a bit more: The problem with the decorator

Re: [Components] PersistentObject: Interface ezcPersistentObjectSession

2009-04-24 Thread Frederik Holljen
2009/4/24 Tobias Schlitt t...@ez.no: Hi Fred, On 04/22/2009 10:08 PM Frederik Holljen wrote: Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know (without looking in the docs) what the purpose is for each of them? What exactly (short in your words) does the new one do?

Re: [Components] PersistentObject: Interface ezcPersistentObjectSession

2009-04-24 Thread Tobias Schlitt
Hi Fred, On 04/24/2009 09:10 PM Frederik Holljen wrote: 2009/4/24 Tobias Schlitt t...@ez.no: On 04/22/2009 10:08 PM Frederik Holljen wrote: Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know (without looking in the docs) what the purpose is for each of them? What exactly

Re: [Components] PersistentObject: Interface ezcPersistentObjectSession

2009-04-24 Thread Frederik Holljen
On 24/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt t...@ez.no wrote: Hi Fred, On 04/24/2009 09:10 PM Frederik Holljen wrote: 2009/4/24 Tobias Schlitt t...@ez.no: On 04/22/2009 10:08 PM Frederik Holljen wrote: Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know (without looking in the