On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 10:39 -0700, Markus Enzenberger wrote:
> These are different things and therefore you cannot really compare GTP
> to UCI
> or call UCI more advanced.
Yes I can. I have had a lot of experience coding up engines for both
protocols and I have no reservations about this, UCI
Jacques Basaldúa wrote:
Hello,
Just an explanation on something I may have explained badly. I see we
agree in the fundamental.
Correcting bias in that estimate should lead to better sampling.
This is usually called "continuity correction"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_correction
On 3, Mar 2007, at 2:50 AM, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
Personally I'd love to see functionality improvements, including:
* moving from file to generic URI references
* interruption of "thinking" engines
I can see the point of sending a message that *requests* the
interruption of a thinking engin
try() and expect() to suffer()
or install() signal_handlers() everywhere().
s.
- Original Message
From: Markus Enzenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2007 12:39:28 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] GTPv3
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
> In an ideal world I'd love to see go move to RFC 3920, but that would
> be quite a disruptive shift.
this RFC describes an asynchronous message passing system; GTP is more like a
simple remote procedure call at Go engines.
These are different
From my point of view GTP has two primary virtues:
(a) ease of implementation
(b) widespread support and interoperability
Anything that undermines these two is unwelcome.
If you need to do things that GTP doesn't (currently) do, (and i agree
that there are many things that it doesn't do that a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Doshay
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
We are also not understanding what we are seeing with SlugGo in the
Computer Room. It is playing games (we don't know where) and we cannot
seem to get a game with it.
I found out where it was by
putting it in my "fan" l
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, nando
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On 3/2/07, Nick Wedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't suppose this matters, but it seems odd.
A day or two ago, I launched GnuGo3pt7 to play in the British Room. It
played happily there. Then today, I saw it was not in the Br
