Ingo Althöfer wrote:
Hello,
this is not Go, but I feel that some people here
should know the answer:
What are the results of the Connect6 competition
in the Computer Olympiad.
Thx in advance, Ingo.
I forwarded the question to organizers. I'll update the web site as soon
as I have the result
Dear Remi,
>> What are the results of the Connect6 competition
>> in the Computer Olympiad...
>
> I forwarded the question to organizers. I'll update the web
> site as soon as I have the results. Speed chess is also missing.
Thanks for the results, they are online now.
> Also: congratulation
Ingo Althöfer wrote:
A question (for the general audience, not especially to Remi):
As far as I know, Yamato is only a nickname and not the true name
of Zen's author. If this is the case, when will the identity of
Zen's author be revealed? Did (or do) the organizers of the Pamplona Olympiad know
All participants of the Olympiad can see his true name on the small
book for the schdule of the tournament. He entried the tournament
with his true name.
Hideki
Ingo Althöfer: <20090517130802.146...@gmx.net>:
>Dear Remi,
>
>>> What are the results of the Connect6 competition
>>> in the Computer
Remi,
I find it interesting that he won with the slowest hardware. I am still
wondering how much performance is still a low influencer. In other
words, a really fast poor algorithm won't be a better algorithm on
slower hardware (or slower software).
Jim
Rémi Coulom wrote:
Ingo Althöfer w
Jim O'Flaherty wrote:
Remi,
I find it interesting that he won with the slowest hardware. I am
still wondering how much performance is still a low influencer. In
other words, a really fast poor algorithm won't be a better algorithm
on slower hardware (or slower software).
Jim
Hardware has
Oops...should have read "...a really fast poor algorithm won't be*_at_*
a better algorithm on slower hardware..."
Jim O'Flaherty wrote:
Remi,
I find it interesting that he won with the slowest hardware. I am
still wondering how much performance is still a low influencer. In
other words, a re
Remi,
It's not so much a question, just a thought about the use of power.
Not every MC program is the same. And that's assuming you leave all the
UCT/RAVE/etc. variations completely out of the comparisons. In fact, in
my reading this list over the last 24 months, I would say it appears
that t
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Jim O'Flaherty
wrote:
> Remi,
>
> I find it interesting that he won with the slowest hardware. I am still
> wondering how much performance is still a low influencer. In other words, a
> really fast poor algorithm won't be a better algorithm on slower hardware
> (or
You can see them in
http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/icga/tournament.php?id=193
2009/5/18 Don Dailey
>
> What was Zen's hardware? What hardware were the other programs running
> on?
>
>
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://
Jim O'Flaherty wrote:
>That said, it means that one "MC" program might be using it's power much
>more effectively (require substantially less CPU cycles to produce a
>similarly skilled result) than another, even though both assert they are
>"MC".
>
>Perhaps it would be better said that a Go prog
Ingo Althöfer wrote:
>Congratulations to Zen author also from me!
Thanks for your all wishes.
>As far as I know, Yamato is only a nickname and not the true name
>of Zen's author. If this is the case, when will the identity of
>Zen's author be revealed? Did (or do) the organizers of the Pamplona
12 matches
Mail list logo
