IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games
Special Issue on Monte Carlo Techniques and Computer Go
Special-issue editors: Chang-Shing Lee, Martin Müller, Olivier Teytaud
In the last few years Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has
revolutionised Computer Go, with MCTS programs
not so long ago (after its win in the computer olympiad) it was
announced (or was it just a rumour) that Zen would come publicly
available or available as commercial package.
Any news about this?.
___
computer-go mailing list
Willemien wrote:
not so long ago (after its win in the computer olympiad) it was
announced (or was it just a rumour) that Zen would come publicly
available or available as commercial package.
It is already shipped in Japan, as Tencho no Igo.
The product's name in English is Zenith Go. (Tencho =
It is already shipped in Japan, as Tencho no Igo.
http://soft.mycom.co.jp/pcigo/tencho/index.html
Looks like Windows only. Anyone know if it will run under wine on linux?
They are advertising it as 2-dan (i.e. Japanese 2-dan).
A rather pricey 13,400 yen, or 10,752 yen ($120) online.
Darren
They are advertising it as 2-dan (i.e. Japanese 2-dan).
Sorry, I skimmed it too quickly. It actually says: KGS 2-dan, which is
equivalent to Japanese Nihon Kiin 3-4 dan.
Darren
--
Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer
http://dcook.org/gobet/ (Shodan Go Bet - who will win?)
Darren,
If it doesn't work on Wine, you could always load a VM, like Sun's VirtualBox,
install a copy of Windows in that and play from there. VirtualBox has very good
performance metrics at above 95% of max (non VM) speed. And there's plenty of
throw-away copies of XP licenses available all
Darren Cook wrote:
They are advertising it as 2-dan (i.e. Japanese 2-dan).
Sorry, I skimmed it too quickly. It actually says: KGS 2-dan, which is
equivalent to Japanese Nihon Kiin 3-4 dan.
Actually it is a little misleading.
They didn't say that the commercial version is KGS 2d :-)
Its 2-dan
Before monte carlo I spent a couple of years writing and tuning an
alpha-beta searcher. It's still in there and I ship it to provide the lower
playing levels. Alpha-beta with limited time makes much prettier moves than
monte carlo.
Would there be interest in a paper that compares the same
Before monte carlo I spent a couple of years writing and tuning an
alpha-beta searcher. It's still in there and I ship it to provide the
lower
playing levels. Alpha-beta with limited time makes much prettier moves
than
monte carlo.
Would there be interest in a paper that compares the
RAVE is part of a larger family of algorithms. In general we can use
direct Monte-Carlo results (i.e., the move played directly from a
node) to determine the probability of winning after playing such a
move. The generalized RAVE (GRAVE?) family does this by including
(usually with some
Peter Drake wrote:
The more I study this and try different variants, the more impressed I
am by RAVE. Boards after the current board is a very clever way of
defining similarity. Also, recorded RAVE playouts, being stored in
each node, expire in an elegant way. It still seems that RAVE fails
Peter Drake wrote:
The more I study this and try different variants, the more impressed I
am by RAVE. Boards after the current board is a very clever way of
defining similarity. Also, recorded RAVE playouts, being stored in
each node, expire in an elegant
Tried CRAVE also, using 3x3 patterns as the context. It didn't work.
David
-Original Message-
From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Peter Drake
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:00 PM
To: Computer Go
Subject:
13 matches
Mail list logo
