Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Urban Hafner wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:13 AM, wrote: > >> I just connected Valkyria on 13x13! >> > > And last night I connected Brown to just see how it works. :) It seems > however that something is wrong again this morning. > Actually, never mind it

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

I forgot to turn of automatic Power off in Windows so after an hour my computer hibernated. I had started Valkyria again this morning (now using 6 threads) and then CGOS seemed to recover. Maybe CGOS froze because of this? Magnus ___ Computer-go ma

Re: [Computer-go] [ANN] Imago - Go board optical recognition

Hi! On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:55:35AM +, Andrea Carta wrote: > > Tomas Musil (a student of mine), has created a state-of-the-art open > > source Go board optical recognition software. We have focused on > > completely automatic runs, so it automatically detects the board corners > > and

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

On Jan 16, 2015, at 1:51 AM, valky...@phmp.se wrote: > I forgot to turn of automatic Power off in Windows so after an hour my > computer hibernated. I had started Valkyria again this morning (now using 6 > threads) and then CGOS seemed to recover. > > Maybe CGOS froze because of this? No, CGOS

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

I also set up a 13x13 client. Seems to work fine, but rating is off I think. I will let it up for a while, hopefully some anchors coming up:) Thanks a lot for setting it up again, Detlef Am 16.01.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Christoph Birk: On Jan 16, 2015, at 1:51 AM, valky...@phmp.se wrote: I for

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Detlef Schmicker wrote: > I also set up a 13x13 client. Seems to work fine, but rating is off I > think. > > I will let it up for a while, hopefully some anchors coming up:) > Yes, without at least one anchor the whole rating will be problematic. How was the setu

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

FatMan ELO 1800 was for 9x9 as far as I remember, I do not remember what on 13x13. On 19x19 it was GnuGo 3.7 level 10 I think and from some historic results I guess 13x13 gnugo 3.7 level 0 was set to ELO1800 Am 16.01.2015 um 18:31 schrieb Urban Hafner: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Detlef

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

I see. I wonder what the correct options for GnuGo are. gnugo --mode gtp --level 0 --chinese-rules --positional-superko --capture-all-dead seems like a good start, right? I will give that a try now ... Urban On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Detlef Schmicker wrote: > FatMan ELO 1800 was for 9x9

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Urban Hafner wrote: > I see. I wonder what the correct options for GnuGo are. gnugo --mode gtp > --level 0 --chinese-rules --positional-superko --capture-all-dead seems > like a good start, right? I will give that a try now ... > It seems to work: http://cgos.boa

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

cgos.boardspace.net says: At the current time there is one player called FatMan with a fixed ELO of 1800 on the 9x9 server and Gnugo-3.7.10 at level 10 serves as the anchor player on the 13x13 and 19x19 server, also with a fixed ELO of 1800. Cheers, David G Doshay

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

On 01/16/2015 12:03 PM, David Doshay wrote: cgos.boardspace.net says: At the current time there is one player called FatMan with a fixed ELO of 1800 on the 9x9 server and Gnugo-3.7.10 at level 10 serves as the anchor player on the 13x13 and 19x19 server, also with a f

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

To prevent the drift, one anchor is enough (at least Don told me so). Hideki Christoph Birk: <54b98df7.7000...@obs.carnegiescience.edu>: >On 01/16/2015 12:03 PM, David Doshay wrote: >> cgos.boardspace.net says: >> At the current time there is one player called FatMan