A long time ago there existed the ‘formal’ and the ‘open’ divisions. Because
SlugGo used so much GNUGo code in a way such that SlugGo could offer several
stones and still beat GNUGo, it was decided that whenever both bots were
available for the tournament one would be in one division and the
That sounds reasonable to me. The downside for you Nick is of course that it's
possible that there's bugs in the program and that it will just crash. ;) But
at least against GnuGo that hasn't happened in a long time.
And I guess once people complain that this setup is unfair towards their
> Somehow my neural net has a blur at "j" and "y”.
That must get yollj awkward at times!
:)
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
Hi Aja,
sorry for this. Of course I meant the bot "Aya".
It seems, I will never learn it consistently.
Somehow my neural net has a blur at "j" and "y".
> Thanks Ingo for listing me with two strong Go programs.
> I think I can give GnuGo 9 stones on 19x19 board. :)
Hmm, not 10 ?
But
I would happily run more than one division (which the KGS scheduler will
regard as separate events). Is there enough interest to justify a second
division?
Nick
On 4 May 2016 at 15:46, Urban Hafner wrote:
> There used to be many more entrants in the past IIRC. And we
Here's a suggestion. I would like to hear what Urban, and others, think
about it.
I enter GnuGo in these events to keep the numbers even. The operators of
strong bots don't want to waste processor cycles proving that they can beat
GnuGo, but they prefer it to a bye.
Instead of my using GnuGo to
There used to be many more entrants in the past IIRC. And we never split
into several tournaments or leagues. But I also feel we should wait for
Nick to chime in. I think we had this exact same discussion a while ago but
I can’t remember the outcome. ;)
Urban
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:38 PM,
Has the number of programs risen that much?
I'd prefer not adding self-declared ranking limitations, though as a
spectator handicap matches are interesting.
Anyways, Urban, I can enter my program too if you want, it is well
bellow GNU Go in 19x19.
Gonçalo
On 04/05/2016 15:27, Erik van der Werf
Or switch to McMahon / Handicaps
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Sebastian Scheib
wrote:
> That would be good, something like in other sports where you have a first,
> second and so... categories.
>
> 2016-05-04 11:00 GMT-03:00 Jim O'Flaherty
That would be good, something like in other sports where you have a first,
second and so... categories.
2016-05-04 11:00 GMT-03:00 Jim O'Flaherty :
> Hmmm...if bots weaker than GnuGo are actively discouraged, perhaps there
> could be a separate tournament level for
Hmmm...if bots weaker than GnuGo are actively discouraged, perhaps there
could be a separate tournament level for that grouping of "aspiring
computer Go" entrants (if it isn't too much extra work). Having bots earn
the right to move into the higher level of (i.e. have met the entry
requirement of
I’m considering entering with my bot but it’s rather weak (a lot weaker
than GnuGo on 19x19) so I don’t know if it makes sense. Unless of course
other weaker bots were willing to enter as well. If no one is interested in
this (or if it’s even discouraged by Nick) then I would refrain from
entering
12 matches
Mail list logo