a strong human.
That is probably safe bet.
--
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
M8 C9 N6 F13 A9 M2 A13 M4
Actually I think all stones are simply assumed alive after cleanup
phase. I think this is done by kgsGtp and bot has no control over this.
From log file: INFO: Cleanup mode has ended by passes. It will be
assumed that all dead stones
have already been removed.
--
Aloril
engines must play until all dead stones are
removed.
--
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
amount of intermediate players
- source code available
- well known entity
- with some randomization should be unpredictable
I suspect that GNU Go without randomization is too predictable. This is
very clearly case on 9x9 board and possibly on 19x19 too.
--
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED
handicap compensation possibly outside gtp
protocol.
More complex.
My vote is for option 4b.
I think breaking alternate coloring of moves is less worse than breaking
2 passes ends game and its more simple than option 3.
--
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED
bot would then reconnect and rejoin game. Alternatively human is
following game and makes it reconnect.
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
--
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED
of bug/miss feature in kgsGtp.
--
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/