Dear Hideki,
thanks for all your open comments here in the mailing
list in the last few days.
I know that these days (with the losses) are really hard
bread for the Zen team. But "in the end" you will emerge
from the lessons stronger than anytime before.
> >When would be possible to buy a new
Pawe Morawiecki:
:
>Hideki,
>
>
>> An important difference from actual game is
>> the search tree, which is very big in real, long-time setting
>> game. One possible interpretation is, Zen read in deep and
>> found the (wrong) seki, which would lead W a sure win and so,
>> played R18 toward thi
Hideki,
> An important difference from actual game is
> the search tree, which is very big in real, long-time setting
> game. One possible interpretation is, Zen read in deep and
> found the (wrong) seki, which would lead W a sure win and so,
> played R18 toward this (again wrong!) winning posi
The strange moves (start with 234th move) could be caused a deep
search together with the misrecognition of the seki (described
in previous post).
With one-shot testing, Zen always chose H14 instead of R18
(actual 234th move), which looks normal. (Time setting was 2
min for a move.) An impor
We have set komi to 5.5 today. This looks worked fine.
The strange yose moves were caused by unknown reason. We are
seeking the cause(s). Observed fact: The upper left center
three black stones cannot be captured but Zen looks evaluated
them as dead. When Zen noticed the truth, horizen effe
>
>
> RATHER OFTEN the outcome was a score where both sides thought
> to have won. In the 5.5/7.5 komi example from Go this means that
> outcomes with +6 or +7 points for Black on the board would occur
> often.
>
>
It looks like this issue is serious again was a factor in today's game
against Park
Hi,
now we see how clever the DeepMind team was (and likely still is).
In both matches (against Fan Hui and Lee Sedol) Chinese rules
were applied.
Some years ago I performed experiments with Monte Carlo search
in special non-zero sum games (with