Alain Baeckeroot wrote:
> Le vendredi 22 février 2008, Sylvain Gelly a écrit :
>
>> 2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
>>> > If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
>>> > level 11 (which is 7
Le vendredi 22 février 2008, Sylvain Gelly a écrit :
> 2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
> > > If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
> > > level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer)
2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
> > If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
> > level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
> > 59.43 X longer.
> >
>
> So if we plot 9X9 r
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
> If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
> level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
> 59.43 X longer.
>
So if we plot 9X9 rank vs time, maybe we have a straight line :)
ELO vs size of the t
--- Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's also interesting how the graph up to level 11
> seems to form 2 very
> straight lines, almost as if they were connected at
> an angle.
>
> This must be a by-product of how we started the
> test. We played only
> the first 4 levels as we were tes
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:08:56PM -0500, Don Dailey wrote:
> It's also interesting how the graph up to level 11 seems to form 2 very
> straight lines, almost as if they were connected at an angle.
>
> This must be a by-product of how we started the test. We played only
> the first 4 levels as w
It's also interesting how the graph up to level 11 seems to form 2 very
straight lines, almost as if they were connected at an angle.
This must be a by-product of how we started the test. We played only
the first 4 levels as we were testing the system and that is where the
"bend" point is.Th
Hi Don,
2008/2/21, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to level
> 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes 59.43 X
> longer.
> Mogo's "stop early" heuristic works better at longer levels.
That is actually
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
59.43 X longer.
Some possible hypothesis:
1. Computer more loaded during early games?
2. Mogo resigns earlier at longer levels.
3. Mogo's "stop
>> It would be great to get even more as we get into higher levels, as it
>> will take a LOT of power to get a lot of games when each games takes 2
>> or 3 hours or more.
>>
>
> Is it possible to have a indicative time and memory consumption at each
> level, for 9x9 and 13x13 study ?
> I gues
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
> The study is running very well. We have 32 computers being used so
> far, some participants are providing 2 (or even more) computers.
>
> It would be great to get even more as we get into higher levels, as it
> will take a LOT of power to get
The study is running very well. We have 32 computers being used so
far, some participants are providing 2 (or even more) computers.
It would be great to get even more as we get into higher levels, as it
will take a LOT of power to get a lot of games when each games takes 2
or 3 hours or mor
12 matches
Mail list logo
