On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Darren Cook wrote:
I actually think that under Chinese rules White wins too because
Black owes 1 point for playing the last (and first) move.
I'd not heard that 1pt adjustment before; is it only when black plays
the last move? Do you have a reference, as this page does not
I actually think that under Chinese rules White wins too because
Black owes 1 point for playing the last (and first) move.
...
I got this from the AGA rules which I (falsly?) assumed to use
chinese counting (http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wjh/go/rules/AGA.html)
I only saw this in section 4, on
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Darren Cook wrote:
I got this from the AGA rules which I (falsly?) assumed to use
chinese counting (http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wjh/go/rules/AGA.html)
I only saw this in section 4, on handicap games:
If the players have agreed to use area counting to score the game (Rule
12),
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Christoph Birk wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Darren Cook wrote:
I got this from the AGA rules which I (falsly?) assumed to use
chinese counting (http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wjh/go/rules/AGA.html)
At one time, the Chinese rules compensated White with an extra point
when Black
I got this from the AGA rules which I (falsly?) assumed to use
chinese counting (http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wjh/go/rules/AGA.html)
At one time, the Chinese rules compensated White with an extra point
when Black got the last move. If Black's last move was to fill a ko he
or she had won,
This extra bonus for black is commonly known by Japanese Go players
who know Chinese rules. That is, the result of a game is the same if
either rules is used (Japanese or Chinese) in simple games (i.e. no
Seki etc.) except this extra bonus for black when the number of moves
of the game is
Why not put both version on CGOS and find out?
- Don
We have at the moment 3 GUIs and each of them does not support the
protocoll.
The main GUI is from GoAhead. Its written in old Atari-Basic and according
to Peter Woitke its difficult to integrate it. ChessBase has promised a
better GUI,
- Original Message -
From: Erik van der Werf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Interesting Test Position (for UCT)
On 7/11/07, chrilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is an interesting
We have at the moment 3 GUIs and each of them does not support the
protocoll.
I have written a C# Prototype-GUI. But I have no time and also not much
interest to develop this further.
..
Chrilly
Hi Chrilly,
GoTraxx has a C# class that interfaces directly with CGOS. Should be fairly
] Interesting Test Position
(for UCT)
On 7/11/07, chrilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Attached is an interesting testposition which
occured in UCT-Suzie
against
Peter-Woitke. If black plays 37 c4 the game is
lost by 0.5 points. If
Black
passes, white gets a lot of threats. Black
I haven't been working on Go at all recently so here's my UI code.
It's not great. I only used it for testing and feedback. It's not
meant to look nice. Perhaps someone else can also use it.
www.fantius.com/Go.UI.rar
___
computer-go mailing list
I forgot to mention, it's C#.
On 7/12/07, Chris Fant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been working on Go at all recently so here's my UI code.
It's not great. I only used it for testing and feedback. It's not
meant to look nice. Perhaps someone else can also use it.
Darren Cook wrote:
You know you can output internal data to stderr and gogui will pick it
up and show it in the shell window?
Yes; I use the stderr output feature extensively. In fact, GoGui can be
extended via customizable analyze commands via GTP, which among other things,
can display
On 7/12/07, Phil G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But there are only two drawbacks with this approach. One, it only works as
a result of a customized GTP command. Sometimes I want it to display
debugging information data while the GTP command is still executing (or
maybe as an addition to an existing
Jason wrote:
I'd also be willing to support slight variants to SGF that use positions
such as C4 instead of wacky things that don't match the notation
everyone else uses and vary depending on the board size.
Anders Kierulf's SmartGo program has the option to use standard Go coordinates
On 7/12/07, Phil G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason wrote:
I'd also be willing to support slight variants to SGF that use positions
such as C4 instead of wacky things that don't match the notation
everyone else uses and vary depending on the board size.
Anders Kierulf's SmartGo program has
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, chrilly wrote:
New lesson learned. It depends on the rule set if something is correct or a
blunder.
So far the Go-masters told me, it does not matter, its practically the same.
Obviously its not. This is not some weired, constructed position, it really
happened and it does
Or did you mean it is too much bother to connect with gogui while
also running your code in a debugger?
That would be great! How do you do that (without going through a
million zillion steps each time)? I use Visual Studio.
Can Visual Studio connect to a running process?
On linux you'd do
New lesson learned. It depends on the rule set if something is correct
or a blunder.
So far the Go-masters told me, it does not matter, its practically the
same. Obviously its not. This is not some weired, constructed
position, it really happened and it does not look strange at all.
I
Attached is an interesting testposition which occured in UCT-Suzie against
Peter-Woitke. If black plays 37 c4 the game is lost by 0.5 points. If Black
passes, white gets a lot of threats. Black can choose between a safe loss,
or some risk and a win.
UCT-Suzie and the public domain version of
Why not put both version on CGOS and find out?
- Don
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 23:17 +0200, chrilly wrote:
Attached is an interesting testposition which occured in UCT-Suzie against
Peter-Woitke. If black plays 37 c4 the game is lost by 0.5 points. If Black
passes, white gets a lot of threats.
Chrilly wrote:
Attached is an interesting testposition which occured in UCT-Suzie
against Peter-Woitke. If black plays 37 c4 the game is lost by 0.5
points. If Black passes, white gets a lot of threats. Black can choose
between a safe loss, or some risk and a win.
UCT-Suzie and the public
On 7/11/07, chrilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is an interesting testposition which occured in UCT-Suzie against
Peter-Woitke. If black plays 37 c4 the game is lost by 0.5 points. If Black
passes, white gets a lot of threats. Black can choose between a safe loss,
or some risk and a win.
23 matches
Mail list logo
