Re: [computer-go] Situational super KO?

2007-03-07 Thread Harri Salakoski
Thanks for detailed explanation, so first similar looking black position has no ko and next has. t. harri - Original Message - From: Erik van der Werf To: computer-go Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:46 PM Subject: Re: [computer-go] Situational super KO? On 3/7/07

Re: [computer-go] Situational super KO?

2007-03-07 Thread Erik van der Werf
On 3/7/07, Harri Salakoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi As reading http://www.cs.unimaas.nl/~vanderwerf/pubdown/solving_go_on_sm all_boards.pdf don't understand chapter 5.1. Following 3*3 go game. Maybe you were not actually reading the above link, but chapter 5 of my thesis? The thesis co

[computer-go] Situational super KO?

2007-03-07 Thread Harri Salakoski
Hi As reading http://www.cs.unimaas.nl/~vanderwerf/pubdown/solving_go_on_small_boards.pdf don't understand chapter 5.1. Following 3*3 go game. -A2 eee bee eee -B2 eee bwe eee -B1 eee bwe ebe -C3 - can be bad move according chapter 5.1 eew bwe ebe -B3? - don't understand how black wins using