On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:18:37AM -0700, David Fotland wrote:
> In the original Mogo paper it's the initial value for the children, rather
> than try every child once.
Ah, you mean the First Play Urgency! Thanks, I will try that.
Anyway, I'm happier; after fixing many bugs and improving my playo
2009 1:43 AM
> To: computer-go
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] rave and patterns
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:06:01PM -0700, David Fotland wrote:
> > Depends on what you mean by basic UCT. I think I had no UCT priors
> then,
> > just a 1.1 or 1.2 K. The playouts incl
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:06:01PM -0700, David Fotland wrote:
> Depends on what you mean by basic UCT. I think I had no UCT priors then,
> just a 1.1 or 1.2 K. The playouts included no self atari, no eye filling,
> no retake ko, and some simple rules for saving group adjacent to last move
> if i
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:49:15AM -0700, David Fotland wrote:
> Simple playouts with no eye fills and mogo 3x3 patterns and basic uct beat
> Gnugo 40% (at version 120)
..snip..
> All win rates are on 9x9 vs gnugo 3.7.20 level 10 with 5000 playouts. After
> this I switched to testing 19x19, and st
Pretty close. Rave is accumulated for every trial (I don't want to throw
away useful information). N depends on the board size. K > N and the ratio
is not fixed. I use progressive widening, and I'm curious what the widening
formula is for other programs, or how slowly it increases.
From: c
