>Does anyone know if the times listed in email headers can be spoofed?
Everything in an email header can be easily spoofed.
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email
Any part of the header can be spoofed with the right technique and
access. That said, it is unlikely to be spoofed on your mail
server's portion without that server having been compromised.
When you see a wonky time stamp it is more likely that the server has
its settings wrong wrt local t
Here is the portion of the GoDaddy registration agreement (for registering a
domain name) that gave me pause when I went to register my first name. Does
this mean what it appears to me to mean - that if you only have a residential
address this will be put in a public directory and can even be s
Does anyone know if the times listed in email headers can be spoofed?
If the sender changes their clock date/ time then the sending date/ time
is spoofed but it seems to be that the server transit point times list
on full header could not be spoofed. Is that true or false... does
anyone know?
there you go!so why not preserve one's name and some indentifier if
necessary to distinguish them from anyone else with the same name, from
being used by anyone else without their permission? Whether the person ever
registers or uses it would be up to them.
By the way, for those concerned
>Actually, this isn't *strictly* true. Unless there's a design flaw,
>downstream devices should simply wait and keep trying. My router's often on
>with my modem off (when I'm resetting the modem).
You are right. A properly designed device should keep trying so the order
in which they are turned o
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, b_s-wilk wrote:
>And while we are at it, why not this: Every legal citizen would ( at
birth >or whenever this would be implemented for everyone else) be
automatically >registered with one domain based on their legal name, with
some unique >identifier to distinguish identica
>And while we are at it, why not this: Every legal citizen would ( at birth
>or whenever this would be implemented for everyone else) be automatically
>registered with one domain based on their legal name, with some unique
>identifier to distinguish identical names.
This would be creepy.
Th
On Oct 8, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
The IT department frowns on Mac users flaunting their facility with the
computer. You are going to get into a lot of trouble.
My brother is in town. He is staying with me as he hunts for a place
to live since taking a new job here in Fairfax C
Actually, this isn't *strictly* true. Unless there's a design flaw,
downstream devices should simply wait and keep trying. My router's often on
with my modem off (when I'm resetting the modem).
On 10/8/07, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Yes, this is interesting. I never have turned o
The scriptures say not that money is the root of evil
but the love of money is.
Checkout One Laptop Per Child project laptop.org
- Original Message
From: Vicky Staubly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 2:53:23 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] G
Checkout One Laptop Per Child
You have to climb the protocol stack.
Checkout One Laptop Per Child project laptop.org
- Original Message
From: Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 3:53:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Power Off?
>
Okay, not automatically registered; but preserve this option if they want
it at some point, making it illegal to use their name (what I just did :))
for domain name without their permission. Then, if someone wanted to, they
could trade away or sell their name, but they would be in control of t
Yes, that's what I meant - the various things she has complement each other
synergistically, leading to both more money, more influence and more power.
I think she is at a point where making money is not the overwhelming goal,
that having influence to do things is, including, now, via political
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Tom Piwowar wrote:
I guess this is why even Oprah herself has a
site and magazine, etc., to complement her show.
Oprah has them to make a lot of money. While Oprah does accomplish much
that is good I expect that you could be mighty disillusioned to find out
that she is a ver
>Yes, this is interesting. I never have turned off power to the cable
>modem and separate router because (according to Cox), they require a
>sequential boot process (is this true?).
Yes, but this is just common sense. You have to turn things from the
outside inwards. The first box connects to t
>I have asked why they do not configure those computers to go into
>'sleep' mode after a certain time of non-use has elapsed, or why they
>do not arrange for the drives to stop running when not needed. or why
>they do not hit the "off" button of the monitors and printers at the
>end of the day.
>Well, the other side of this is that their prices seem significantly lower
>than others I've seen, so if this is accurate, for people like myself,
>without much money, it's very tempting to go the el cheapo way, which this
>apparently is. So if you or anyone else knows of better alternatives t
>so, can i ask, what's the point of all the different domain extensions at
>this point? is it like the propagation of area codes for phone lines
>because of the popularity of fax machines? if i register a domain name,
>does it matter if i use .net or .org or .com or .name, etc etc etc. in
>fact
>And while we are at it, why not this: Every legal citizen would ( at birth
>or whenever this would be implemented for everyone else) be automatically
>registered with one domain based on their legal name, with some unique
>identifier to distinguish identical names.
This would be creepy.
***
>I guess this is why even Oprah herself has a
>site and magazine, etc., to complement her show.
Oprah has them to make a lot of money. While Oprah does accomplish much
that is good I expect that you could be mighty disillusioned to find out
that she is a very good businesswoman first and foremo
>Tom, OTOH, I picture as Yosemite Sam, stomping on his hat, when someone is
>productive using a PC.
I spend a lot of my time making PC users as productive as possible and
less of a burden on their Mac-using brethren.
* ==>
Can't just buy a .edu address either iirc.
Matthew
The only thing you
can't buy is gov and mil.
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PR
Good question! Whatever the original rationale, what is the point currently
in having all these fine distinctions, most of which are either meaningless
or which apparently not many people grasp anyway? Guess it does create more
potential business for folks like GoDaddy and their ilk since they
At 10:07 AM 10/8/2007, you wrote:
>On 10/7/07, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >I also sort of assumed that .org meant a real nonprofit. Otherwise,
>> various
>> >unscrupulous outfits and organizations might simply pose as being
>> >non-profits. Could have the equivalent of, say, Mic
On 10/7/07, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I also sort of assumed that .org meant a real nonprofit. Otherwise,
> various
> >unscrupulous outfits and organizations might simply pose as being
> >non-profits. Could have the equivalent of, say, Microsoft.org
>
> Today anybody can get an
26 matches
Mail list logo
