I would like to be able to access a couple of nearby public wireless
systems. My computer is located on the ground floor of my home, and I
cannot get a good enough signal at that location. However, on my upper
floor, or in the attic, with a directional antenna, I can get a signal
that is ro
You need a wireless bridge to connect the two signals. Last time we set
this up we used a buffalo router flashed with DDWRT.
http://www.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv2/index.php
The flashing might be a little heavy duty for what you want to do, but you
need at least a router that will allow bridged mode. I
Sandbagged by an Apple with a Leopard in its mouth! What a Jobs!
No mention by Apple that Leopard will not support
Classic on my iMac G5, and I didn't heed your
advice and ordered the thing from Amazon! :(
[I was salivating over Time Machine and Spaces.]
Does this seem okay? Partition my iMac
Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Don't waste your time with Safari, it's a bad browser. I will spare you a
>>diatribe on just how bad it is.
>
>No Safari is not a "bad browser." It is different in some respects from
>somebody else's favorite browser, but that does not make it bad. Havin
David Pogue of the NY Times has a rundown of some of the new ways things
work in 10.5 that you might find interesting.
http://www.nytimes.com/indexes/2007/10/25/technology/circuitsemail/index.html
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND
>Is there a way for me to be able to locate an antenna upstairs, and
>have its received signal wirelessly transmitted to my computer located
>on the lower floor?
I have not looked into this myself, but I have read that this is a common
problem with municipal WiFi. Their signal is okay outside
After almost 7 years of Apple telling us that Classic is a temporary
solution, I can't really complain. You can do as I do, I'm typing this on
a PowerMac 7300 that runs OS 9 just fine. A $99 accelerator card makes
this Mac run very nicely. It is networked with my OS X Macs to pass
information b
>The problem with Safari is that it fails to meet accepted standards with
>regard to rendering of HTML, support for the HTTP protocol, etc.
You mean like being the first browser to pass the W3C's ACID2 test?
www.webstandards.org/2005/10/31/we-love-to-see-you-smile/
But that was 2 years ago, how
>It doesn't matter whether Windows has 51% or 92% of the traffic.
>Standards are for the rest of us who choose not to use Windows for many
>reasons, not just for Windows users...
On Friday night's BBC World the news reader said Apple had a 40% share of
the US computer market. (Yes, I rewound my
At 3:11 PM + 10/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snippage]
The problem with Safari is that it fails to meet accepted standards
with regard to rendering of HTML, support for the HTTP protocol, etc.
I'm using the Safari 3.0b beta. It passes the ACID2 compliance test.
It's JavaScript implem
AVG spoken here. Tried Avast, ClamWin, F-Prot, Norton, a few others.
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: S
I think a high percentage of newspaper and printing professional have
always gravitated to the Mac. Even our local home town paper uses
Mac's and this guy is a tightwad.
Stewart
At 01:55 PM 10/28/2007, you wrote:
They might get laughed at even at MS. A few years ago I had an employee
who us
12 matches
Mail list logo
