On Jul 13, 2009, at 8:18 PM, Tony B wrote:
I think what may be confusing you are the various codecs and choices
involved these days. As I said, if the operator makes an error in
rendering, then you may notice a tremendous difference. But that's
wetware; the hardware has nothing to do with it.
T
You may disagree, but you will still be wrong. I can test it for you
if you like, because we still have several old Pentium 4 systems, as
well as newr Core2. If you render the same settings on both machines
the output will be bit for bit identical. In fact, for years I used an
old Pentium 2 to rend
Old chinese proverb says, A closed mind is like...oh screw it who cares.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2009, at 8:22 PM, mike wrote:
>
>> That just proves he should stop buying cheap pc's.
>>
>
> Is there any other kind?
>
>
>
> **
On Jul 12, 2009, at 8:22 PM, mike wrote:
That just proves he should stop buying cheap pc's.
Is there any other kind?
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a memb
Try www.free-codecs.com
Subject:
Re: Video codec search
From:
trac...@aol.com
Date:
Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:24:20 EDT
Thanks for the advice but I already discounted the "I give up and quit
"solution to this for the
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Tony B wrote:
> Anecdotal, and completely wrong. All video is digital these days, so
> unless you do something wrong, you'll get out what you put in. i.e.,
> The quality of the parts in the computer has absolutely nothing to do
> with the quality of your finished v
Anecdotal, and completely wrong. All video is digital these days, so
unless you do something wrong, you'll get out what you put in. i.e.,
The quality of the parts in the computer has absolutely nothing to do
with the quality of your finished video.
> to out of a PC. One fellow, who actually work
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Mike wrote:
> I dont know, I buy what I want, not what MS tells me to buy.
>
> Sent from my iPod
You, sir, are non-compliant!
Sent from my Scarab A-400 NetPlayer
*
** List info, subsc
I dont know, I buy what I want, not what MS tells me to buy.
Sent from my iPod
On Jul 12, 2009, at 5:45 PM, "phartz...@gmail.com"
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:22 PM, mike wrote:
That just proves he should stop buying cheap pc's.
Perhaps so, but don't all the new ads being put out
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:22 PM, mike wrote:
> That just proves he should stop buying cheap pc's.
Perhaps so, but don't all the new ads being put out by MS clearly
suggest that one should buy cheap PCs?
Steve
*
** Lis
That just proves he should stop buying cheap pc's.
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:52 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:20 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
>
> > Why not buy a good one in the first place? I see the primary difference
> with
> > NLE on Macs vs PCs is that the Mac folk make
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:20 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
> Why not buy a good one in the first place? I see the primary difference with
> NLE on Macs vs PCs is that the Mac folk make movies while the PC folks just
> play treasure hunt and talk about making movies.
I know two Windows users who dabble w
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, wrote:
Still looking for the ACM Codec if someone can assist.
The only ACM codec that I am aware of is the OGG VORBIS ACM codec.
It is an audio codec, not video.
I'm surprised none of our Windows gurus g
On Jul 12, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Tony B wrote:
They already have Vegas 9 so there's no need to buy another
transcoder. Or shouldn't be.
Why not buy a good one in the first place? I see the primary
difference with NLE on Macs vs PCs is that the Mac folk make movies
while the PC folks just play t
They already have Vegas 9 so there's no need to buy another
transcoder. Or shouldn't be.
You might try the k-lite codec pack (or similar):
http://download.cnet.com/K-Lite-Mega-Codec-Pack/3000-13632_4-10794603.html
But I have a feeling the error may not be accurate. Have you tried any
freeware for
On Jul 12, 2009, at 10:24 AM, trac...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks for the advice but I already discounted the "I give up and
quit
"solution to this for the time being.
Why not http://www.sorensonmedia.com/video-encoding/
*
*
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, wrote:
> Still looking for the ACM Codec if someone can assist.
The only ACM codec that I am aware of is the OGG VORBIS ACM codec.
It is an audio codec, not video.
Steve
*
** Lis
Thanks for the advice but I already discounted the "I give up and quit
"solution to this for the time being.
I was actually looking for advice as to address the concern from a
technical point of view because periodically I have to shoot in the MOV format
due
to the requests of others and I w
Best to stick to the few formats M$ allows. A fine example of why
Windows makes a lousy NLE platform.
On Jul 11, 2009, at 1:05 AM, Tony B wrote:
No, don't bother trying to use .mov at all on a PC. It's never worked
right for me, and will likely never work right for you. Stick with the
AVC (mp
No, don't bother trying to use .mov at all on a PC. It's never worked
right for me, and will likely never work right for you. Stick with the
AVC (mp4) format.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:50 AM, wrote:
> Just got a new camcorder. Shoots in MOV or MP4. MP4 not a problem to
> deal with BUT.t
Just got a new camcorder. Shoots in MOV or MP4. MP4 not a problem to
deal with BUT.the MOV clips (native to Final Cut Pro[Mac]) are posing a
problem. I am using Vegas Pro 9 on my Windows Vista PC as a Non-Linear
Editor and was told that transcoding away from the MOV files to something
21 matches
Mail list logo
