www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/business/media/04adco.html
I might as well quote the part our WFBs will want to see, to save them
the trouble of repeating it ad nausium...
"The news was not all bad for Microsoft..."
*
** List
Ha. Got me good for a minute, with gems like "So far, Apple seems to
be winning the fight." and "Microsoft's current operating system,
Windows Vista, is a well-known disappointment.". Until I looked up and
saw it was an article not about computers, but about advertising.
Good one.
On Tue, Feb 10,
>Ha. Got me good for a minute, with gems like "So far, Apple seems to
>be winning the fight." and "Microsoft's current operating system,
>Windows Vista, is a well-known disappointment.". Until I looked up and
>saw it was an article not about computers, but about advertising.
I was wondering how yo
No, that part is pure fantasy. Talk about misinterpreting!
Perhaps you're referring to the 2% share increase? Great. At that
rate, Macs should reach 50% of the market somewhere around the year
2100.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
>>Ha. Got me good for a minute, with gems li
Quoting Tom Piwowar :
www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/business/media/04adco.html
I might as well quote the part our WFBs will want to see, to save them
the trouble of repeating it ad nausium...
"The news was not all bad for Microsoft..."
Clearly, the guys a paid Microsoft shill.
***
>No, that part is pure fantasy. Talk about misinterpreting!
So you are bad at math too?
8 --> 10 is a 25% increase. 2 is 25% of 8. 8 + 2 = 10.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
**
Yes, Apple and its market share are growing at the incredibly fast pace
of a successful startup. Anyone who does not see this as very
interesting must be dull indeed. To wave this off with a "2 percent" of
some pc-fanbois market-fantasy means total monkey-configuration: see no
evil, hear no evil,
Ah. So a 2% increase in share is a 25% increase in your fantasy world?
Okay. I can _almost_ accept that twisted math, except if the whole pie
is 10 instead of 100, then 2 is only 20% of it, not 25%. That 2 is 1/4
of 8 means nothing, because you cannot define the whole market as
being 8 percent.
On
>Ah. So a 2% increase in share is a 25% increase in your fantasy world?
The Vatican suggests we consider your view "a cultural phenomenon not as
science."
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hJK9enh8baMhdRguzkPFWcjJj9NQD968S0K80
Works for me!
I agree with the Vatican.
Intelligent design is neither intelligent nor biblical.
Trying to use the Bible to justify a creation
model is a disservice to the text.
Stewart
At 06:54 PM 2/11/2009, you wrote:
>Ah. So a 2% increase in share is a 25% increase in your fantasy world?
The Vatican
Tony, Tony, Tony,
I have tried to ignore your useless rants, but this one caught me.
If you don't understand how going from 8% to 10% is a 25% increase, I am
even sadder. I thought you had some small amount of technical knowledge.
This is basic elementary school stuff.
The market is divided in
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Tony B wrote:
> Ah. So a 2% increase in share is a 25% increase in your fantasy world?
> Okay. I can _almost_ accept that twisted math, except if the whole pie
> is 10 instead of 100, then 2 is only 20% of it, not 25%. That 2 is 1/4
> of 8 means nothing, because y
12 matches
Mail list logo
