Re: Third tar.gz status?

2010-02-09 Thread Grant Ingersoll
That looks pretty good. Did you see my last question about the library dependencies? The Makefiles seem to be expecting them to be in /usr/share/... I think we need to include the dependencies ahead of time so we can make sure they are covered license wise. On Feb 9, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Karl

Re: Third tar.gz status?

2010-02-09 Thread Karl Wright
Grant Ingersoll wrote: BTW, I think you can start working on the build script even before the code gets committed. That way we can do the initial commit and than almost immediately you can add the build stuff. I wanted to do rearrangement of source packages and structure in svn prior to

Re: Third tar.gz status?

2010-02-09 Thread Karl Wright
Grant Ingersoll wrote: That looks pretty good. Did you see my last question about the library dependencies? The Makefiles seem to be expecting them to be in /usr/share/... I think we need to include the dependencies ahead of time so we can make sure they are covered license wise. I

Ant builds

2010-02-09 Thread Karl Wright
I'm looking at what is required for ant builds of LCF, and for this I sort of want to understand accepted practices for Apache builds of this kind. (1) Structure LCF will build many distinct jars, which need to be kept distinct because not all deployments can build or include all

Re: Ant builds

2010-02-09 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Karl Wright wrote: I'm looking at what is required for ant builds of LCF, and for this I sort of want to understand accepted practices for Apache builds of this kind. (1) Structure LCF will build many distinct jars, which need to be kept distinct because