Re: Release?

2010-11-09 Thread Karl Wright
If you can claim well supported for the web connector, you certainly should be able to claim it for the RSS connector. You could also reasonably include the JDBC connector because it does not require a proprietary system to test. But if your definition is that tests exist for all the well

Release?

2010-11-09 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Now that we have NTLM figured out and the Memex stuff behind us, how do people feel about working towards a release? -Grant

Re: Release?

2010-11-09 Thread Jack Krupansky
At least get a release 0.1 dry-run with code as-is out ASAP to flush out release process issues. This would help to send out a message to the rest of the world that MCF is an available product rather than purely development/incubation. Then come up with a list of issues that people strongly

Re: Release?

2010-11-09 Thread Jack Krupansky
And one of the issues on the list should be to define the well-supported connectors for 0.5 (or whatever) as opposed to the code is there and thought to work, you are on your own for testing/support connectors. Longer term, we should get most/all connectors into the well-supported category,

Re: Release?

2010-11-09 Thread Jack Krupansky
And the wiki doc is also part of the release. Does this stuff get a version/release as well? Presumably we want doc for currently supported releases, and the doc can vary between releases. Can we easily snapshot the wiki? Will we have nightly builds in place? I think a 0.1 can get released