Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Karl Wright
Feel free to generate an RC0 for 0.5.1 any time; I think all the correct tickets have been pulled up into the branch already. Thanks! Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > Yes we do.  Would you be willing to do that? > > Thanks! > Karl > > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Sh

Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Karl Wright
Yes we do. Would you be willing to do that? Thanks! Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Shinichiro Abe wrote: > Okay. > Do we need to change release-version into 0.5.1 at build.xml in the branch? > > Shinichiro Abe > > On 2012/05/12, at 19:39, Karl Wright wrote: > >> Hi Abe-san, >> >> For poi

Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Okay. Do we need to change release-version into 0.5.1 at build.xml in the branch? Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 19:39, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi Abe-san, > > For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as > the main release. So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating

Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Karl Wright
Hi Abe-san, For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as the main release. So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags. Thanks, Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe wrote: > Yes I did

Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week. Please create 0.5.1 branch. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote: > It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three > tickets into the 0.5 release branch: > > CONNECTORS-453 > CONNECT

Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Karl Wright
It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three tickets into the 0.5 release branch: CONNECTORS-453 CONNECTORS-467 CONNECTORS-471 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated. The release can

Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-07 Thread Erlend Garåsen
If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me. This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably other web containers as well. Erlend On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote: My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and too much of a pain bef

Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-04 Thread Karl Wright
My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and too much of a pain before then. If we succeed in graduating in May, I'd give a +1. If not, then maybe we should just try to release the 0.6 version instead. Karl On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi wrote: > I t

Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-04 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable compatibility for Tomcat 7.x. +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version Piergiorgio 2012/5/1 Karl Wright > We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over > CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a

Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-01 Thread Karl Wright
We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to fix this one issue? Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door early? Karl