Hi,
I have applied this commit and it works.
Thanks
~Sameer
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Patrik Flykt
patrik.fl...@linux.intel.comwrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 17:44 +0530, Sameer Naik wrote:
Hello,
I updated to connman-1.20 and found that hidden wifi networks
Hello,
I updated to connman-1.20 and found that hidden wifi networks are not
returned when scanning for services. Upon inspection I found that commit
#363393cfb1a5f95f8892f40662486c87b80d0091 is where the breakage occurs.
For reference, please find the commit message below:
commit
Hello,
I am using connman-1.12 on my STB that runs linux kernel version 2.6.22.
In my kernel configuration i have enabled the following:
CONFIG_BRIDGE=m
CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ENABLED=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED=y
only max_ssid (1 or more)
known hidden SSIDs. This need to be fixed.
Reported by Sameer Naik
---
Dumb test to change, sorry.
plugins/wifi.c | 31 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/plugins/wifi.c b/plugins/wifi.c
index 4b097fc
the calls further to figure out why
g_supplicant_interface_get_max_scan_ssids returns 0.
Regards
~Sameer
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hello,
I have been checking the autoconnect to hidden network feature.
For far no luck.
For your
Hello,
I am using connman-1.12 on a STB platform.
I have implemented a connman client and agent to handle connecting to wired
and wireless services via connman.
I am currently testing connections to hidden wireless services. Right now i
am able to connect to hidden wifi services after responding
Hello,
I was trying to understand the state change of services from READY to
ONLINE state.
From what i can gather a service state will change from READY to ONLINE
once connman is able to fetch
Hidden=truehttp://ipv4.connman.net/online/status.html(for ipv4).
In my system i have a wired service
Got it.
Will try to hack the source. Will let you guys know if i get anywhere.
Thanks and Regards
~Sameer
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Tomasz Bursztyka
tomasz.burszt...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Sameer,
I guess this is the expected behaviour.
You guess right.
I would like to
I forgot to mention one thing, i have
PreferredTechnologies = ethernet
in my main.conf.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hello,
I am using connman-1.11 on an STB platform that has an inbuilt LAN port.
For WIFI i am using a wifi dongle
Hello,
I am using connman-1.11 on a STB platform.
I have some general questions regarding the UI implementation for
connecting to hidden wifi networks.
Currently in connman, i can list all the wifi services and filter out the
hidden services and let the user select the service that he/she may
information using socket
api's or something for my display purposes. But i believe connman would do
a better job at it ;)
Regards
~Sameer
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Patrik Flykt
patrik.fl...@linux.intel.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 17:32 +0530, Sameer Naik wrote:
I
Thanks Tomasz,
That was really helpful. The pieces of the puzzle seem to be coming
together for me.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka
tomasz.burszt...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Sameer,
Now, this is fine if there is only one hidden network listed. Say for
example there are
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Patrik Flykt
patrik.fl...@linux.intel.comwrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 18:24 +0530, Sameer Naik wrote:
192.168.1.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0
192.168.6.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 wlan0
These are individual
Hello Patrik,
I am using a wireless USB dongle that has a realtek 8291cu chipset. The
driver in use was realtek's 8192cu driver and the version is
v3.4.4_4749.20120730. The driver is downloadable from the following
location:
Here is the driver download link if required:
http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1PFid=48Level=5Conn=4ProdID=277DownTypeID=3GetDown=falseDownloads=true
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hello Patrik,
I am using
will be switching to the older driver for now. However do let me know if
need me to perform any tests.
Thanks and Regards
~Sameer
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hello Tomasz,
Please find attached connman.log and wpa_supplicant.log file generated
Hello Patrik,
Even after removing -W wext switch from the connmand command line the issue
persists.
Right now i am using wpa_supplicant-1.1.
Regards
~Sameer
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Patrik Flykt
patrik.fl...@linux.intel.comwrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:41 +0530, Sameer Naik wrote
Please ignore this.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hi,
I am testing connman-1.10 and i get the following warnings when i try to
resolve a dns address.
START OF LOG
connmand[2815]: src/dnsproxy.c:udp_listener_event() Received
Hi,
I am testing connman-1.10 and i get the following warnings when i try to
resolve a dns address.
START OF LOG
connmand[2815]: src/dnsproxy.c:udp_listener_event() Received 32 bytes (id
0x090c)
connmand[2815]: src/dnsproxy.c:parse_request() id 0x090c qr 0 opcode 0
qdcount 1 arcount 0
Thanks Jeff and Patrik.
I was missing the main.conf file. After adding it as per your suggestions
its working.
As suggested by Patrik i have set
PreferredTechnologies = ethernet
SingleConnectedTechnology = false
in main.conf
First impression is that it works.
But i am facing a really weird issue
Hello,
Today i noticed one issue. I am not sure whether this is a bug or this
is by design.
I have a saved wifi profile with Autoconnect turned on and was able to
connect to that profile without any problems. Yesterday i updated
wpa_supplicant to version 1.0 and found that connman was no longer
Hi,
Things i have noticed in the clock API.
1. If a timeserver is specified, using Timeservers property, that is
already in the global timeservers list. The time sync is not
restarted.
2. If the TimeUpdates property is set to manual and then back to auto,
the NTP sync is not started/restarted.
Hello,
According to my understanding NTP synchronization will occur in
connman once service state is CONNMAN_SERVICE_STATE_ONLINE. Further
service will enter the online state once connman can communicate with
http://ipv4.connman.net/online/status.html.
However in my case, generally an NTP server
Please review.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Apparently the technology is being enabled before it is even in the
technology_list. Since the technology cannot be found in the
technology list, its enabled flag remains unset.
On Fri
to
connman_device_set_powered.
Can u apply the following patch and check if this solves the issue? I will
will then post it on the ML for review.
Thanks!
Alok.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Please review.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:56
[3G]
Enable=false
[WiMAX]
Enable=false
Regards
~Sameer
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:09 PM, alok barsode alokbars...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hello Alok,
Please find attached connman.log file.
Do let me
is powered (as you pointed out). The
code flow shows that the technology is disabled.
Regards
~Sameer
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hello,
Yes, this happens every single time. One thing worth noting is that i
have my rootfs mounted over NFS
Nevermind. I have updated to git version. Apparently the API of the
git version is much refined (and does not suffer from the issues
present in the stable version).
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hello,
I am using the current stable
Hello,
I am using the current stable version 0.78.
Regards
~Sameer
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:15 AM, alok barsode alokbars...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sameer,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Sameer Naik
sameer.subscripti...@damagehead.com wrote:
Hello,
I seems that the technology state
Lookup for the proxy scheme and host should be performed on the recently
duplicated proxy string. As a result of this issue proxies specified by
the scheme http_proxy=http://192.168.1.1:3128, would not work.
From 71b2d26867227d9e4d5c67fea081ee30b3d1ac39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sameer Naik
would not work.
From a6446d8d9c3dd00864204a2352e66415743e6329 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sameer Naik sam...@damagehead.com
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:40:31 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gweb: set session-host to the parsed proxy hostname.
If the proxy is specified then we should set the session-host
31 matches
Mail list logo