Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rfkilling technology fixes

2012-10-01 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka tomasz.burszt...@linux.intel.com wrote: Hi, While playing around with enabling/disabling technology I found out that if a technology is hardblocked through the physical switch, first the technology is still listed in GetTechnologies, but of

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rfkilling technology fixes

2012-10-01 Thread Tomasz Bursztyka
Hi Jussi, Hi, While playing around with enabling/disabling technology I found out that if a technology is hardblocked through the physical switch, first the technology is still listed in GetTechnologies, but of course enabling it from dbus API will lead to nothing. User HAS to play with the

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rfkilling technology fixes

2012-10-01 Thread alok barsode
hi, On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Tomasz Bursztyka tomasz.burszt...@linux.intel.com wrote: Hi Jussi, Hi, While playing around with enabling/disabling technology I found out that if a technology is hardblocked through the physical switch, first the technology is still listed in

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rfkilling technology fixes

2012-10-01 Thread Tomasz Bursztyka
Hi Alok, But you might not even have drivers for it, so it won't be possible to get it enabled (my patches does not fix that issue anyway, there is an issue to solve here) And #3 because API 1.0 does not propose anything about that. Cant we just return an different error for hard blocked

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rfkilling technology fixes

2012-10-01 Thread alok barsode
hi Tomasz, On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka tomasz.burszt...@linux.intel.com wrote: Hi Alok, But you might not even have drivers for it, so it won't be possible to get it enabled (my patches does not fix that issue anyway, there is an issue to solve here) And #3

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rfkilling technology fixes

2012-10-01 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka tomasz.burszt...@linux.intel.com wrote: I've not followed connman that closely recently, so it's entirely possible I'm missing something. Anyway, previous UX requirements in this area were: 1. list the technologies that we have the hardware

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rfkilling technology fixes

2012-10-01 Thread Tomasz Bursztyka
Hi Jussi, Consistency. Removing any evidence that the device is wifi-capable is just wrong. Not exposing the hw-block state to UI is wrong as well and now that you mention it, I think I've complained about it before:) True, you opened a bug long ago on BMC. Anyway wifi card has no driver, wifi

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rfkilling technology fixes

2012-10-01 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Tomasz, Consistency. Removing any evidence that the device is wifi-capable is just wrong. Not exposing the hw-block state to UI is wrong as well and now that you mention it, I think I've complained about it before:) True, you opened a bug long ago on BMC. Anyway wifi card has no