Re: svn commit: r420933 - in /maven/continuum/branches/continuum-acegi/continuum-webapp/src/main/resources: commons-logging.properties log4j.properties

2006-07-11 Thread Brett Porter
*the onlooking crowd gasps* "Trygve pulled out the veto!" :) Regardless, I agree. I'm pretty sure Continuum already has a log4j configuration in it's application.xml that can include both these configurations. On 12/07/2006 5:04 AM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: Trygve Laugstøl wrote: [EMAIL PROT

Re: Continuum Security design

2006-07-11 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
Carlos Sanchez wrote: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Security Please take a look and provide feedback on the semantics of what to secure and to what level. Some discussion with Jesse McConnell about the security ... [11:01:38] jmcconnell: do you see the comment in it's fully ren

Re: Continuum Security design

2006-07-11 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I've updated the wiki with my latest thoughts. I suggest this reading http://acegisecurity.org/docbook/acegi.html#domain-acls which explains how to add instance based security with ACLs. It's a good option and allows fine grained permissions for user, project and type of operation. On 7/11/06, J

Re: Continuum Security design

2006-07-11 Thread Jesse McConnell
well, here are my thoughts on the matter summed up after some subsequent discussion on this between joakim, carlos and myself: If continuum is to scale up to multiple projects, say continuum building in the same instance along side maven and the maven repository manager then we are going to need

Re: Listeners for build events

2006-07-11 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
Ahmed Omarjee wrote: Hi, I have a requirement to perform other operations before checkout of a project, as well as after a successful or failed build. The context of why I need this is as follows; I am using PVCS at a corporate client, and have already begun writing a maven-scm-plugin for PVC

Re: svn commit: r420933 - in /maven/continuum/branches/continuum-acegi/continuum-webapp/src/main/resources: commons-logging.properties log4j.properties

2006-07-11 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
Trygve Laugstøl wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: carlos Date: Tue Jul 11 10:29:53 2006 New Revision: 420933 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420933&view=rev Log: Add logging config files -1 to the log4j configuration -1 might be a bit strong, I just meant to say that we configur

Re: svn commit: r420933 - in /maven/continuum/branches/continuum-acegi/continuum-webapp/src/main/resources: commons-logging.properties log4j.properties

2006-07-11 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: carlos Date: Tue Jul 11 10:29:53 2006 New Revision: 420933 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420933&view=rev Log: Add logging config files -1 to the log4j configuration Logging is configured through Plexus, see application.xml -- Trygve

Re: Listeners for build events

2006-07-11 Thread Ahmed Omarjee
My humble opinion is that some sort of listener implementation can help us consider the entire build cycle as a "unit of work" in a pluggable and reusable fashion by raising and then acting on an appropriate set of events. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Listeners-for-bui

Re: Listeners for build events

2006-07-11 Thread Ahmed Omarjee
- IMHO, the act of checking code out, building and then labelling is not part of the typical developers build lifecycle (ie. on a single developers machine, he handles this kind of thing manually if needs be, by updating his codebase, labelling, and branching when required), this kind of automatio

Re: Continuum Security design

2006-07-11 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
Carlos Sanchez wrote: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Security Please take a look and provide feedback on the semantics of what to secure and to what level. Some discussion with Jesse McConnell about the security ... [11:01:38] jmcconnell: do you see the comment in it's fully ren

Re: Listeners for build events

2006-07-11 Thread dan tran
On 7/11/06, Ahmed Omarjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some questions: - Should the continuous integration tool not take the responsibility for performing the labelling, since it checked out the code, reports and notifies interested parties on success or failure of the compilation and tests agai

Re: Listeners for build events

2006-07-11 Thread Ahmed Omarjee
Some questions: - Should the continuous integration tool not take the responsibility for performing the labelling, since it checked out the code, reports and notifies interested parties on success or failure of the compilation and tests against that code ? - In my mind the fact that I have built

Re: Listeners for build events

2006-07-11 Thread dan tran
I think you should let maven-release-plugin do to this work for you provided that you have all required maven-scm-api interface implemented -D On 7/11/06, Ahmed Omarjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have a requirement to perform other operations before checkout of a project, as well as a

Listeners for build events

2006-07-11 Thread Ahmed Omarjee
Hi, I have a requirement to perform other operations before checkout of a project, as well as after a successful or failed build. The context of why I need this is as follows; I am using PVCS at a corporate client, and have already begun writing a maven-scm-plugin for PVCS (I can't sit around w