I agree with an alpha-1 labelled release.
I think someone will need to flush JIRA before cutting the release
(close things that are no longer relevant, or fixed, or duplicate).
- Brett
On 24/02/2007, at 8:35 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed
Agreed. Someone needs to:
- properly mark up the model as it was for 1.0.3 release
- add methods to continuum-data-management to utilise that and then
make any necessary transformations (c-d-m will do the basic 1-to-1
conversions)
- probably write a little CLI to fire it off.
On 24/02/2007,
On 24 Feb 07, at 5:08 PM 24 Feb 07, Jesse McConnell wrote:
ideally we will revisit a couple of fundamentals for this release
still like build profiles, so yes, a couple of planned new features,
hopefully assisted by a new person or two interested
I would chop the new features pretty close to
I really don't like the idea of pushing again the release for more
features, because what today are couple features and "a week of work"
it's gonna end in another alpha release 5 months later as it happened
with maven and it's happening with continuum.
We have to be reasonable about how many feat
ideally we will revisit a couple of fundamentals for this release
still like build profiles, so yes, a couple of planned new features,
hopefully assisted by a new person or two interested
jesse
On 2/24/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if we are not planning to add new features and
if we are not planning to add new features and just bugfixes then I
understand it's a beta
On 2/24/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24 Feb 07, at 1:05 PM 24 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> +1 for a beta, if everything it's cool let's go for 1.1 and push to
-1 for beta
This ver
On 24 Feb 07, at 1:05 PM 24 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
+1 for a beta, if everything it's cool let's go for 1.1 and push to
-1 for beta
This version has so many changes it cannot be called a beta until it
has been tried en masse. It is most certainly an alpha.
Jason.
1.1.1 whatever e
+1 for a beta, if everything it's cool let's go for 1.1 and push to
1.1.1 whatever else that needs to be fixed
On 2/23/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed nicely with
some plans I had talked about late last year in regard to
conti
+1
For an alpha-1, you can't call it anything else until you push it out
and get feedback. It's getting close to a year the codebase is quite
different and it's like releasing something new. But I think the
group owes it to users to get this thing out. Continuum deserves the
garner the sa
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
On 2/23/07, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A milestone should focus on showing the fancy new features and bugs
fixed. Stuff like security, upgrading existing databases etc are all
secondary.
I understand what you mean but I think database upgrade is very
im
On 2/23/07, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A milestone should focus on showing the fancy new features and bugs
fixed. Stuff like security, upgrading existing databases etc are all
secondary.
I understand what you mean but I think database upgrade is very
important because users wi
I'm ok for a release, maybe a M1 would be better. I don't think we'll can add
all issues plan for 1.1 in a short time.
Emmanuel
Jesse McConnell a écrit :
I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed nicely with
some plans I had talked about late last year in regard to
continuum...I a
12 matches
Mail list logo
