Anyone else hit with RPM taking a long time ( ~15 seconds ) before it starts
to install something? I think I've had this problem ever since I upgraded to
4.0.3. Not a *huge* deal, but it's annoying and I'm wondering what its doing.
so if anyone could send me an /boot/initrd for 2.4.5 kernel...
/\
| José Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| TEKLYNX International http://www.teklynx.com |
Hi!
I wrote:
I just upgraded my Mandrake 8.0 version to RPM version 4.0.3-0.14mdk from
the cooker dist.
Now I get a segmentation fault whenever accessing the db:
# rpm -vv --rebuilddb
D: rebuilding database /var/lib/rpm into /var/lib/rpmrebuilddb.2296
D: creating directory
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Vincent Danen wrote:
Ummm... there *is* a php-mysql package... I'm not sure what you guys
are talking about...
Where? At least the mirror that I use, doesn't have that package
(sunsite.no). I removed --without-mysql and recompiled it and MySQL works
again.
--
Whoa...I
So sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 08:42:59AM +0100:
so if anyone could send me an /boot/initrd for 2.4.5 kernel...
Sorryx, but if you ask such a question, then I suppose you're not quite
ready for cooker...
Anyhow, nobnody can send you a initrd, you gotta create one
So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200:
Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
What do you mean?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com |
So sprach Steve Fox am Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 12:39:26PM -0500:
Anyone else hit with RPM taking a long time ( ~15 seconds ) before it
starts to install something? I think I've had this problem ever since
I upgraded to 4.0.3. Not a *huge* deal, but it's annoying and I'm
wondering what its doing.
Hi all,
I recently switched to LM8.0 from RH6.2 I'm having this strange problem
with fetchmail since then. My fetchmail doesn't get any mails from any of
my pop or imap servers in daemon mode. After tracing I found that both the
servers are giving an invalid request. But if I run in
Hi,
Is there a libsocket.so version for Linux? Where could I find it?
Thanks for CC me when replying.
Cheers,
Marc
Vincent Danen wrote:
On Thu Jul 05, 2001 at 12:55:58AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach John Cavan am Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 06:42:57PM -0400:
Now that MySQL support is not a seperate package, the new version
doesn't have it built in though it obsoletes it. Simply remove the
guran wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200:
Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
What do you mean?
Someone at Mandrake has earlier argued that he did not want to furnish
the new kernel because
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2001, 14:52:09 Uhr MET, schrieb Eugenio Diaz:
--- Goetz Waschk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turn off the browse option with Browser=false in the gdm.conf file; or
generate a new gdm.conf file by using gdmconfig. For some reason the current
version of gdm does not like the
grep NOTFOUND depslist.ordered:
pango-0.16-5mdk.i586 768524 18 NOTFOUND_libglib-1.3.so.5 20
NOTFOUND_libgmodule-
1.3.so.5 23 NOTFOUND_libgobject-1.3.so.5
libatk0-0.1-6mdk.i586 95123 18 NOTFOUND_libglib-1.3.so.5 20 59
NOTFOUND_libgthre
ad-1.3.so.5 NOTFOUND_libgmodule-1.3.so.5 23
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 05:03:15PM +0400, Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
grep NOTFOUND depslist.ordered:
pango-0.16-5mdk.i586 768524 18 NOTFOUND_libglib-1.3.so.5 20
NOTFOUND_libgmodule-
1.3.so.5 23 NOTFOUND_libgobject-1.3.so.5
libatk0-0.1-6mdk.i586 95123 18 NOTFOUND_libglib-1.3.so.5 20 59
My
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 05:03:15PM +0400, Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
grep NOTFOUND depslist.ordered:
pango-0.16-5mdk.i586 768524 18 NOTFOUND_libglib-1.3.so.5 20
NOTFOUND_libgmodule-
1.3.so.5 23 NOTFOUND_libgobject-1.3.so.5
libatk0-0.1-6mdk.i586 95123 18 NOTFOUND_libglib-1.3.so.5 20 59
If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single
reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro.
If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me!
Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see that one one hand
you (meaning who ever adds stuff
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:22:36PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Andrej Borsenkow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see that one one hand
you (meaning who ever adds stuff to cooker) blindly remove library that
is needed by
just had to put my nonsensical 2 cents in.
/me waits for chmouel to chime in since he's been with this project as
kernel maintainer for much longer than even Juan.
/me also notes some significant changes in the 246pre's.
/me wonders why we seem to anticipate freeze all of the sudden. /me
Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 08:42:59AM +0100:
so if anyone could send me an /boot/initrd for 2.4.5 kernel...
Sorryx, but if you ask such a question, then I suppose you're not quite
ready for cooker...
Anyhow, nobnody can send you a
hi,
the kde startup-sceen seems to be displayed but its one
~2pixels wide..
the window-decoration changes but no panel, no icons on the
desktop and no functionality is there:-(
for debugging purposes i've created a .xinitrc which just
contains exec xterm
The package of nessus 1.0.8 at sunsite.uio.no (contrib) is missing the
update-nessus-plugins program!!
Strangely the manpage for the program exists??
Anyone is able to make an update?
Regards,
Mads
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
hi,
the kde startup-sceen seems to be displayed but its one
~2pixels wide..
...
any ideas?
tc
Some files listed in the rpm(kdebase) don't get installed, mostly under
/usr/share/apps. It happens with some other rpms
On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:21, you wrote:
Frankly, I by far prefer this kind of questions rather than plain old
insults that you wrote beginning this thread.
Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
It was not my intention, to kick on a person, I wanted to
Guillaume,
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Sorry, I owe nothing to you, please go emit a judgment on someone else.
You are absolutely right. Sorry!
Randy Kramer
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:42:19AM -0600, Axalon wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
hi,
the kde startup-sceen seems to be displayed but its one
~2pixels wide..
...
any ideas?
tc
Some files listed in the rpm(kdebase) don't get
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:19:51PM +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:42:19AM -0600, Axalon wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
hi,
the kde startup-sceen seems to be displayed but its one
~2pixels wide..
...
any
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
BTW: is this a bug in the package or a bug in rpm?
Rpm, the cooker ??mdk I've got installed right now won't even output
missing files to cpio. I saw something about a new tarball in the latest
changlog, don't know if it fixes any of this. I got
Could also be updatedb+makewhatis. And after, the idled count is way
down because kswapd or some ioroutine was doing some heavy lifting.
Could be, the symptoms seems right
Does this happen at about 4 am your time?
No more likely 4 pm my time (Sao Paulo, Brasil)
Regards,
Mads
Kaixo!
test:~# rpm -q XFree86-libs
XFree86-libs-4.1.0-4mdk
test:~# LANGUAGE=C urpmi XFree86-libs
no package named XFree86-libs
test:~# rpm -q xcin
xcin-2.5.2.3-2mdk
test:~# LANGUAGE=C urpmi xcin
no package named xcin
there seems to be a problem...
is that known? and how could I fix it?
Mads Rasmussen wrote:
Could also be updatedb+makewhatis. And after, the idled count is way
down because kswapd or some ioroutine was doing some heavy lifting.
This seems like nothing to worry about. Do you understand what idle
means? Idle means it's not doing anything, so if it's not doing
Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
Kaixo!
there seems to be a problem...
is that known? and how could I fix it?
Thanks
I see a couple other problems as well:
1.) koffice and gaim are incorrectly listed as needing updating. This is
because of some weird versioning scheme with gaim (e.g. gaim
On Thursday 05 July 2001 05:31, you wrote:
Hi,
Is there a libsocket.so version for Linux? Where could I find it?
Thanks for CC me when replying.
Cheers,
Marc:
RPM resource libsocket.so
Found 2 RPM for libsocket.so
I found two references to this lib. libsocket.so if this is what
tell me my dear,
why is it that evolution requires gnome-spell yet drakx did not install it?
tell me my dear,
why is it that evolution requires gnome-spell yet drakx did not install it?
I think that there are some 'minor' problems with rpm at the moment.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tell me my dear,
why is it that evolution requires gnome-spell yet drakx did not install it?
I think that there are some 'minor' problems with rpm at the moment.
i assume u mean those that will be fixed by rpm developers and not
mandrakemen so okay. (xcuse
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
tell me my dear,
why is it that evolution requires gnome-spell yet drakx did not install it?
It's sorta common.
All gnome packages need to have gnome-doc-tools installed in order to
build docs correctly, yet gnome-doc-tools is nowhere inside cooker.
anyone else having a variety of problems with evolution including not
being able to compose?
I seem to be getting random lockups with kernel-2.4.5-9mdk that i don't get
with kernel-2.4.3-20mdk. It may be related to insmod errors on bootup during
hardware detect. It also happens most often on heavy loads.
Here is an output from dmesg on both kernels sorry about the long posts
Linux
Anyways, cooker is cooker, and it could perfectly include the -ac
kernel a few
hours after release, but then do not send any mail claiming 'my disk was
toasted by latest mdk kernel'
Eh? Do not send bug reports? What are you talking about? Cooker is there
so that people can test new versions
In a recent changelog, it said Java support was fixed, and it appeared
to be. Looks like it's gone again. BTW, I'm using j2sdk 1.4 from sun,
the 1.3 plugin Mozilla tries to download doesn't seem to work at all.
--
Sincerely,
David Walluck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So sprach François Pons am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 05:02:58PM +0200:
Ok, now bug fixed in 12mdk now, there was a bug for uploading it again and
closure dependencies resolution, this last one take me more time to fix.
Thanks, I'll try it.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote
Andrej Borsenkow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single
reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro.
If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me!
Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see
Jaimon Jose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Hi. I'm maitaining the mdk fetchmail package
I recently switched to LM8.0 from RH6.2 I'm having this strange problem
with fetchmail since then. My fetchmail doesn't get any mails from any of
my pop or imap servers in daemon mode. After
and guess what...it aint there. db3-utils is, but it didnt have the
library postfix wanted.
???
Randy Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guillaume,
I know you have a sense of humor, based on this quote:
If you've ever had a chance to visit Mercury or asteroid Geographos,
here you'll find them looking exactly the same way, following exactly
the same path as when you've left them.
I
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single
reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro.
If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me!
regards
guran
So sprach Shalrath am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:00:12AM -0800:
Ive noticed this too. I really wouldnt like rpm to check all removable
media every time I try to install a simple package.
I don't think it does. I rather think it's checking all mount points,
and if you're using supermount,
Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
Either it is cooker or not.
That is a policy, even I can understand - more of that!
regards
guran
guran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:21, you wrote:
Frankly, I by far prefer this kind of questions rather than plain old
insults that you wrote beginning this thread.
Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
It was not my
Yikes!
[root@tp RPMS]# rpm -Fvh kde* qt* arts-2.2-0.beta1.1mdk.i586.rpm libarts2-*
libpcre0-*
Preparing...### [100%]
file /usr/lib/libical.so.0.0.0 from install of kdepim-2.2-0.alpha2.3mdk
conflicts with file from package
Hi
According to alan Cox there are fs pb's in kernels lower than ac24 and Cooker
is at ac18. Has anyone tested for urpmi problems on a new kernel?
regards
guran
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just upgraded urpmi to -10mdk, and it's still misbehaving as before.
I ran urpmi ~askwar/dosfstools-2.7-2mdk.i586.rpm, and instead of
using the local file, it downloaded the file again. But at least it
did not tell me, that everything is already
Not symlinking Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/sh - ash
disconnecting from ftp.sunet.se
All done, Exiting
[root@test mirror]# ll /root/cooker/i586/Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/
EOICI 1472
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root16136 eAI 25 13:51 badblocks*
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 332 eAI 25
kdebase-2.2-0.beta1.1mdk.i586:1 132436089 18 139 143 120 125 136 55 128 141
121
165 157 148 134 20 156 140 145 146 150 135 129 126 154 130 173 144 131
NOTFOUND_
libdb-3.1.so 119 174 124 153 137 23 56 133 117 115 123 147 122 116 277 132
53 22
155 164 307 57 167 65|64|66 11|9 10|9
Anybody cares
Le Vendredi 6 Juillet 2001 07:55, Andrej Borsenkow a écrit :
kdebase-2.2-0.beta1.1mdk.i586:1 132436089 18 139 143 120 125 136 55 128 141
121
165 157 148 134 20 156 140 145 146 150 135 129 126 154 130 173 144 131
NOTFOUND_
libdb-3.1.so 119 174 124 153 137 23 56 133 117 115 123 147 122 116 277
On 20010705 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
But the policy of waiting to introduce new kernels into Cooker must mean
that someone have concluded that all future problems with Cooker is not
related to problems already existent in the kernel.
What is the good thing, please related to pb's
Pixel wrote:
in fact, i'd say it depends mainly on maintainer... and on the size of the
package ;pp
OK - I will have to buy into reality.
regards
guran
Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200:
Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
What do you mean?
Someone at Mandrake has earlier argued that he did not want to furnish
the new kernel because some experimental stuff
On Thursday 05 July 2001 10:37, you wrote:
Hi
According to alan Cox there are fs pb's in kernels lower than ac24 and
Cooker is at ac18. Has anyone tested for urpmi problems on a new kernel?
Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
regards
guran
guran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 05 July 2001 10:37, you wrote:
Hi
According to alan Cox there are fs pb's in kernels lower than ac24 and
Cooker is at ac18. Has anyone tested for urpmi problems on a new kernel?
Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is
Blue Lizard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
/me also notes the strange reluctance of mdk employees (synonymous with
'people that are paid') to publicly upload the significant changes in
drakx that will (hopefully) be polished up nice and shiny for a super
duper 8.1 stability and 9.0
What happened? Did you delete it? Why not just build your own. Try:
[user@system boot]# man mkinitrd
for details
Cheers!
~Charles
On Thursday 05 July 2001 03:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so if anyone could send me an /boot/initrd for 2.4.5 kernel...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tell me my dear,
why is it that evolution requires gnome-spell yet drakx did not install it?
I think that there are some 'minor' problems with rpm at the moment.
i assume u mean those that will be fixed by rpm developers and not
mandrakemen
63 matches
Mail list logo
