"Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single > > > reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro. > > > > > > > If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me! > > > > Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see that one one hand > you (meaning "who ever adds stuff to cooker") blindly remove library that > is needed by half of the other packages (with motto "It's Cooker") and on > the other hand refuse to release kernel version that apparently is good > enough for the rest of the world. Either it is cooker or not. in fact, i'd say it depends mainly on maintainer... and on the size of the package ;pp
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Juan Quintela
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... J . A . Magallon
- RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Juan Quintela
- RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel David Odin
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Randy Kramer
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Randy Kramer